- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 vs Leupold VX-II 3x9x50
Posted on 10/27/13 at 1:45 pm to Tigah32
Posted on 10/27/13 at 1:45 pm to Tigah32
quote:
Dude C'mon. I'm trying to feel good about this purchase.
I recommend a Nikon then. I mean yeah, what you mentioned was great, but why not save some money and get the same quality? It wont wow your friends when you pull it out at the camp but I promise the deer wont care.
2
Posted on 10/27/13 at 1:48 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:I have a Nikon pro staff right now. While it's a nice scope it's no where near my friends Zeiss or my brothers Leupold.
I recommend a Nikon then. I mean yeah, what you mentioned was great, but why not save some money and get the same quality? It wont wow your friends when you pull it out at the camp but I promise the deer wont care.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 10/27/13 at 5:31 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
I mean yeah, what you mentioned was great, but why not save some money and get the same quality
Not true. Nikon is not on par. Its not bad, but its not a zeiss. That being said, I'd spend a little more money and buy the 1" Swarovski.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News