quote:
Watch what happens if/when his sorry arse gets back in the lineup. You will see what happens to our defense and our defending 3rd down percentage.

you realize he played the 1st 2 games, including the Tampa Bay game (our best defensive performance of the season)

quote:
The reason the Saints Defense is playing well is because that piece of shite is NOT playing. He is a complete liability. He is slow and can't cover shite.

and he's a great tackler and blitzer, which is the role he played, in the box, the first 2 games of the season.

They've already shown to be effective with him

This post was edited on 10/21/13 at 8:59 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by LaBornNRaised

Loomis blows

Member since Feb 2011

11004 posts

Posted on 10/21/13 at 9:03 pm to TigerBait1127

quote:
They've already shown to be effective with him

And effective without. Keep him out.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by KindOfABigDeal

Houston

Member since Jan 2008

448 posts

Posted on 10/23/13 at 2:28 pm to TigerBait1127

quote:
he's a great tackler and blitzer

In what bizarro world are you talking about? Just because you make a lot of tackles doesn't make you a "great tackler" particularly since you're playing safety. You're supposed to be able to tackle! He's avg, AT BEST, as a tackler. And we know by a long track record that he's atrocious, atrocious in coverage which is by definition what a defensive back should be best at. He was the second worst safety in the league last year per defensive metrics. And, he's not a great "blitzer". Again, its not hard to get a sack when no one blocks you so it would make sense that Vaccarro and Jenkins would be better "blitzers" because they're faster. This shite argument is tired. Harper is tired. And frankly I'm tired of hearing about 41. Please just go fricking away.

0 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board