Started By
Message

re: Saints should trade for HaKeem Nicks

Posted on 10/14/13 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18966 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Plus Colston already fill the Nicks role on the team.


Nicks has the ability to be a threat downfield on the outside. I'm not sure if Colston is playing injuried but he looks a step slower. He never has been a stretch the field receiver anyway. Colston has made his living exploiting mismatches with LB's & safeties over the middle & down the seams.

quote:

He'll get overpaid in the offseason


This is irrelevant when discussing a half season rental of Nicks. Whatever contract a team decides to give him in the offseason is meaningless.
Posted by NOLAbaby
CumTown
Member since Sep 2013
1758 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:13 pm to
Hakeem's played all six games this season with no injuries...
Plus, it'd be nice to send another running back to NY to fail
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram