- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dan Snyder says go pound sand if you want the name changed..
Posted on 10/9/13 at 2:52 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 10/9/13 at 2:52 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Draconian Sanctions
Is is racist if a black man calls himself a "n*gga", like the black guy I was playing GTA V online with last night?
In context: "You ain't gonna roll up on dis n*gga wid dat gat".
Posted on 10/9/13 at 2:56 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
I just became a redskins fan....
Because their piece of shite owner likely lied and referenced a bunch of shady "facts" in defense of his brand?
I think he ranks second only to Donald Trump in terms of Americans I'd like to see castrated.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 2:58 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I'm guessing people see this:
And they might say "look at that. This fat white guy wearing "Redskins" gear. White people took the name Redskin, and commercialized it. Now you have all of these white fans, maybe even black fans, etc. exploiting Native American culture for their own pleasure while the reality is that they kicked Natives off their land and put them on reservations and now their communities are in shambles. White people ruined the Native Americans, and now they are exploiting them. Dressing up like them, laughing, smiling, and carrying on."
This is because these PC liberals see all white people as racist. Automatically. Or they have "white guilt". So if they name a team the "Redskins", they clearly aren't doing it because they see Native American tribes as strong, prideful, noble, etc... you know... things that would be a good representation of their team. They are exploiting them for racist reasons.
And they might say "look at that. This fat white guy wearing "Redskins" gear. White people took the name Redskin, and commercialized it. Now you have all of these white fans, maybe even black fans, etc. exploiting Native American culture for their own pleasure while the reality is that they kicked Natives off their land and put them on reservations and now their communities are in shambles. White people ruined the Native Americans, and now they are exploiting them. Dressing up like them, laughing, smiling, and carrying on."
This is because these PC liberals see all white people as racist. Automatically. Or they have "white guilt". So if they name a team the "Redskins", they clearly aren't doing it because they see Native American tribes as strong, prideful, noble, etc... you know... things that would be a good representation of their team. They are exploiting them for racist reasons.
This post was edited on 10/9/13 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:02 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Posted by Draconian Sanctions I really don't care if they keep the name or not, just don't tell me it's not racist.
What's your definition of racist?
1) anything related to or dealing with issues of race - sure
2) anything bigoted or pejorative related to or dealing with race - sorry you're wrong
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:02 pm to tccdc
quote:
Dan Snyder says fu Obama if you want the name changed..
fify
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:04 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
I've not once seen anyone complain about this. Who is complaining? Where are they getting this from? Internet? Phone calls? Letters? WTF?
white do good pc liberals
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:05 pm to lsuroadie
quote:
Dude, just admit the only people offended are ultra liberal white guilt PC junkies.
What a hilariously ignorant thought
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:07 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
So I guess Cain Velasquez, a UFC fighter, is racist against himself with his big "Brown Pride" tattoo across his chest?
I mean, it certainly isn't possible that descriptive terms for skin color (brown, red, yellow, black, white, etc.) could be used as a source of pride.
You would have a point if the Redskins were made up of Native Americans.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:08 pm to lsuroadie
quote:
the only people offended are ultra liberal white guilt PC junkies
this. im so sick of the "we cant offend anybody" attitude. if you don't like the name, don't support the team. but stop trying to make others conform to your viewpoint, especially when the majority of the country disagrees with you.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I really don't care if they keep the name or not, just don't tell me it's not racist.
It's not racist.
Racist means having the belief that people of one race are inferior to others because of their race.
Please explain how the Washington Redskins football team being named the Washington Redskins fits the definition of racism. (This should be good)
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:14 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
Relax. Most liberals don't care, and the majority of those that do say keep the name. The others write for Slate and other (mostly) bullshite publications.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:14 pm to ZTiger87
quote:It wasn't a direct analogy.
You would have a point if the Redskins were made up of Native Americans.
I was simply saying that the name "Redskins" is not inherently racist just because it defines skin color.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:14 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
Because their piece of shite owner likely lied and referenced a bunch of shady "facts" in defense of his brand?
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:18 pm to Sevendust912
Well go on, tell me how that's wrong.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:19 pm to TotesMcGotes
I don't even like Dan, but you are saying he needs castrated? What is your evidence that he
quote:
likely lied and referenced a bunch of shady "facts" in defense of his brand?
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:19 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
Most liberals don't care
I agree. that's why I quoted the phrase "ultra liberal white guilt..."
but we still have a growing problem with the mentality that if one person is offended then we can do it, and i'm not talking about just in sports. The minority is controlling the majority because their feelings got hurt. frick that pussy shite.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:22 pm to elposter
quote:
Please explain how the Washington Redskins football team being named the Washington Redskins fits the definition of racism
Look, if you were trying to get a Native American's attention you aren't going to say, "Hey redskin!". Just like you wouldn't say hey ****, honky, spic or chink. So if redskin isn't a word you would use in civil conversations, why would it be acceptable to name a football team redskins?
quote:
I was simply saying that the name "Redskins" is not inherently racist just because it defines skin color.
It's racist because it's an offensive word used to describe Native Americans. That's just how it is.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:26 pm to tccdc
quote:
Dan Snyder says go pound sand if you want the name changed..
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:28 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
Look, if you were trying to get a Native American's attention you aren't going to say, "Hey redskin!". Just like you wouldn't say hey ****, honky, spic or chink.
I don't say those things because if I want to get a random persons attention I go "Excuse me, sir/ma'am"
What a dumb argument you have there
This post was edited on 10/9/13 at 3:29 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News