- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:26 pm to skullhawk
quote:
Can the receiving team cross the 45 before the ball does?
Of course
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:27 pm to jimbeam
quote:
If so I'd knock the frick out of the kicker
Exactly. I think Landry was the closest to the ball. Can you imagine Landry with a full head of steam hitting a kicker looking down at the ground for the ball. You'd have to hope the kicker's parents weren't at the game.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:28 pm to dnm3305
quote:
"Just the tip". Fun game btw.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:28 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
I don't think hand is touching there. I would not have overturned the call either way.
You can't honestly believe this. The kicker reached back and pulled the ball into his body. this is the act of the tuck. Unless you think the ball levitated into his body, he is clearly touching it here.
Auburn also benefited from a very questionable holding penalty wiping out a TD, so the Ref Gods giveth and taketh away. Call it a draw, and that's leaving off ODB's pass interference call.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:29 pm to bigpapamac
quote:
Can the receiving team cross the 45 before the ball does?
Of course
I was 99% sure. I don't know why teams allow the kicker to keep pulling this shite when they know an onside kick is coming (LSU had the hands team in so they clearly knew it was coming).
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:29 pm to Baloo
quote:
Just the tip has to touch.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:30 pm to tiger81
I thought it was pretty clear that he touched it too early.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:40 pm to Baloo
quote:
very very questionable
fify
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:49 pm to M. A. Ryland
quote:
I thought it was pretty clear that he touched it too early.
Yeah. Me too. Right from the get go.
Now, I didn't know whether they'd call it...
The announcers got everyone riled because they (incorrectly) kept referring to the position of the player. He may or may not have gone past the 10 yd line, but it's irrelevant. It's the position of the ball. Regular speed and slow-mo both pretty clearly showed that the ball hadn't gone 10 yd. Didn't seem that close.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:55 pm to skullhawk
The kicker is protected from that kind of hit. The receiver had to touch the ball to have caught it. HE was past the line but the ball wasn't pretty simple. The 10 yard mark is a plane like the goal line. I say the 10 yard mark because it won't always be the 45 and yes the receiving team can do as they please regarding advancing on the ball.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 3:59 pm to jimbeam
quote:
If so I'd knock the frick out of the kicker
....exactly what I predicted had they scored again.
I've seen that run before when the opposing team expected it and broke it for 7 the other way.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:01 pm to mdtiger1
quote:
The kicker is protected from that kind of hit
...not when actively engaged in the play. They could absolutely light his arse up.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:02 pm to Baloo
quote:bullshite. I watched it several times in slow motion. The ball was moving. He was moving. The ball was in that area a little bit before he actually pulled it in. I know you're not this dumb.
You can't honestly believe this. The kicker reached back and pulled the ball into his body. this is the act of the tuck. Unless you think the ball levitated into his body, he is clearly touching it here.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:06 pm to AlxTgr
I thought he touched it and the replay seemed to confirm that.
With the SEC refs and review crew, I was surprised it was overturned because they could've determined that there was not conclusive evidence to overturn call on the field.
Starting to wonder what the call would have been like had that occurred in Tuscaloosa.
With the SEC refs and review crew, I was surprised it was overturned because they could've determined that there was not conclusive evidence to overturn call on the field.
Starting to wonder what the call would have been like had that occurred in Tuscaloosa.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:07 pm to GeauxTigerTM
I would upvote this a billion times if I could.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:10 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Starting to wonder what the call would have been like had that occurred in Tuscaloosa.
I don't wonder at all. I base my conclusion on the past 35 years of sec-al favoritism.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:10 pm to nicholastiger
quote:Yeah, that's what I would have expected given how close it was.
With the SEC refs and review crew, I was surprised it was overturned because they could've determined that there was not conclusive evidence to overturn call on the field.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:15 pm to CharlesLSU
quote:
and broke it for 7 the other way.
Can't advance an onside kick.
Posted on 9/23/13 at 4:15 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
bullshite. I watched it several times in slow motion. The ball was moving. He was moving. The ball was in that area a little bit before he actually pulled it in. I know you're not this dumb.
I get your take and it well may be correct, but the better bet would be he had touched it to some extent due to proximity.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News