Started By
Message

re: Saints cut Chamberlain from IR for failing to disclose medical condition

Posted on 9/3/13 at 11:48 pm to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 11:48 pm to
He was already on IR and not taking up a spot. So no, we can't bring anyone in because we are still at 53.

What it did do was save us about $1 mil on the cap.

I want to say what this means is that Chamberlain had an injury and didn't tell the Saints about it(or what it was) so they were allowed to cut him for not disclosing it with them.

And Meach took Vilma's spot. Vilma was still on the 53 until today. Chamberlain was IRed over a week ago I believe.
This post was edited on 9/3/13 at 11:49 pm
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

I want to say what this means is that Chamberlain had an injury and didn't tell the Saints about it(or what it was) so they were allowed to cut him for not disclosing it with them.

Why wouldn't the Saints automatically know?



Unless the injury he didn't disclose actually occurred before we ever signed him.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram