Started By
Message

re: The Sex Pistols played Baton Rouge in 1978

Posted on 1/15/14 at 10:49 am to
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Congratulations. Not everybody works that hard to prove they're clueless.

You're welcome. You then refuted precisely zero of my argument. Make an argument for your case, don't just call the other guy stupid.

quote:

In specific reference to your last paragraph, do you have even the most basic understanding of the music industry in England at that time. Do you really think DIY was something viable for English bands?

Of course it was. Just as it was viable for American bands. Now, would the Sex Pistols have had a #1 single or been on the Today show? No. Of course not. But they wanted to be stars. They wanted to be part of the machinery, protests to the contrary. American punk pretty much developed, post 1977, completely outside the music industry which allowed for complete artistic freedom but guaranteed it wouldn't get on the radio.

Dischord was started by teenagers in high school. SST was a radio repair shop. They were completely barred from entry from the music industry as well, so they just made their own. And given the incredible physical distance involved, it was actually more difficult for American bands. They did it anyway (thanks to some pioneering tours by Black Flag, creating an underground network across the nation). But American punk bands had to record at 3 AM, use old tapes, make the artwork themselves, glue the covers together on their own, and play in non-traditional venues as bars and clubs wouldn't book them. I mean, I love the Clash, but how are they really different from the Rolling Stones (who I also love)?

It's why vets of the American hardcore scene of the 80s have little but contempt for the British punk scene. They were counterculture, as approved by the music industry. As soon as they cut off funding, they fell apart. American hardcore developed almost entirely with at best indifference and at worst outright hostility from the record industry.

Our band could be your life.

quote:

Paul Cook and Steve Jones in particular spent a lot of time nailing their parts down. It's pretty well polished.

Yeah, which is why it has more in common with hard rock and metal. For a band that claims anarchy, their record sounds real polished. But a polished turd is still a turd. Give me the joyful anarchy of Black Flag (even with Spot's pretty f'n awful production).

British punk and American punk really took two divergent roads. It's funny people talk of the Ramones influence, but they are far more influential to British bands than here in the States. And I do like a lot of old British punk bands (the Clash, Stiff Little Fingers, the Buzzcocks, etc), but they did have very little influence on the American hardcore scene. I think Creedence might've had more influence on American hardcore than the Sex Pistols (almost entirely due to the Minutemen's worship of them, and Fortunate Son, a near template for US punk even though it didn't exist yet).
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 10:51 am
Posted by Sayre
Felixville
Member since Nov 2011
5513 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Of course it was. Just as it was viable for American bands


The music industry in England at the time was not like it was in the U.S. post '77. When you were completely barred from the music industry, as the Pistols effectively were, they didn't have the same DIY machinery as the Americans had to fall back on. The basic structure and hierarchies between the two cultures were vastly different. And in general the DIY ethic just didn't exist there at that time. Hell, they couldn't even get gigs in England because of the backlash.

quote:

But they wanted to be stars. They wanted to be part of the machinery,


Mclaren wanted them to be stars so they could crate havok and controversy. That was his bag. I don't' think they themselves thought that much into it (other than Lydon I don't think they had the emotional depth to do so).


quote:

Yeah, which is why it has more in common with hard rock and metal.


I don't hear that at all, and I imagine a great many other won't either.

quote:

But a polished turd is still a turd. Give me the joyful anarchy of Black Flag


One man's turd is another man's gem, and our opinions regarding these two acts are directly opposed. I don't think I dislike BF as much as you do the Pistols, I do not think basic production values and song writing abilities are something to dismiss. That's the main problem I have with a lot of American punk from the early to mid-80s. I was there, and in all the years since not much of it appeals to me any more than it did then. Don't get me wrong, I like intense music, but there's nothing wrong with a good song either. Attitude only carries you so far. And it's not just American acts that I find that have that problem. Other than a couple songs I find the Clash to be impossible to listen to too. Just absolutely atrocious. I appreciate what they're trying to say, they just suck at saying it in a tuneful manner.

In general I just do not get the hate the Pistols get from so many American punk fans. A lot of it seems to be based on turf wars and silly beefs and not the simple facts of the matter.


This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 1:43 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram