- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why all this controvery about the Man of Steel ending *SPOILERS*
Posted on 7/2/13 at 10:53 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
Posted on 7/2/13 at 10:53 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
I can't remember if I posted in this thread or another. The reason I stated was that Zod was a psychopath and wanted to end humanity. I believe he would have just tried to get back in the city and create the chaos like in the movie anyway.
Superman thrust him into space pretty easily though, and somehow manages to land back in Metropolis. The chances of them landing back in Metropolis after being thrust into orbit are almost zero and seems as if you almost have to try to land back there.
It's just nuts that Superman couldn't put him out of Metropolis. His main goal was to kill Superman at that point, and he would have followed him. If he was trying to first kill the people of Metropolis, then I don't think he would have sought out a fight with Superman and just run from him as he continued to destroy the city.
This post was edited on 7/2/13 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 7/2/13 at 11:03 pm to OMLandshark
Maybe. We don't know what he would have done but from a lot of movies that involved civilians, the psychotic villain usually tries to incorporate the civilians into the equation and make the hero have a handicap. This wasn't addressed in the movie but is what I accepted and it didn't bother me to the extreme like some others that I watched it with.
I also think that they went back into Metropolis to save confusion for some audience members so as not to create another environment that would lead to questions and stray away from what they should be focused on. It's just like most superhero movies that revolve around "New York", they don't want to wander from what is more important.
By simplifying the equation, the story can be told and enjoyed instead of a monstrosity of confusion the Architect in The Matrix portrayed.
I also think that they went back into Metropolis to save confusion for some audience members so as not to create another environment that would lead to questions and stray away from what they should be focused on. It's just like most superhero movies that revolve around "New York", they don't want to wander from what is more important.
By simplifying the equation, the story can be told and enjoyed instead of a monstrosity of confusion the Architect in The Matrix portrayed.
This post was edited on 7/2/13 at 11:23 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News