Started By
Message

re: Man of Steel destruction stats final battle (spoiler)

Posted on 6/25/13 at 9:00 pm to
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24466 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Without Superman...

6.5 billion dead

Property damage - $0.00 What? currency in any form no longer exists.



this. It seems like a simple point but one people keep missing.

What I do think though is that they should have at least tried to show him moving the battle or doing something to save some lives (just to help us connect with the character more).

I mean if you wanted that destruction because of the studio insisting upon action or whatever else, that's fine, but still you have to show there being an attempt at an alternative.

And for the love of god, you don't have him making out with Lois with the city in smoldering ruins around him. That part was unforgivable (and stupid to boot)
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Without Superman...

6.5 billion dead

Property damage - $0.00 What? currency in any form no longer exists.


This.

quote:

this. It seems like a simple point but one people keep missing.

What I do think though is that they should have at least tried to show him moving the battle or doing something to save some lives (just to help us connect with the character more).

I mean if you wanted that destruction because of the studio insisting upon action or whatever else, that's fine, but still you have to show there being an attempt at an alternative.


And this.

This move would've been more awesome and captured what makes Superman perfectly if he at least attempted to move the battle somewhere else. It doesn't have to be successful but an attempt would've made the movie even better and people wouldn't be complaining about this destruction.

quote:

And for the love of god, you don't have him making out with Lois with the city in smoldering ruins around him. That part was unforgivable (and stupid to boot)


I just fuking rolled my eyes at this.

That was so unbelievably cliche and campy/corny but it didn't ruin the movie. Superman should've been fricking upset and in despair over the destruction and a make out session should've been the last thing on his mind.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23076 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

And for the love of god, you don't have him making out with Lois with the city in smoldering ruins around him. That part was unforgivable (and stupid to boot)
I was hoping for the amnesia kiss from superman II. Lois shouldn't know that superman is clark kent. pretty simple rule IMO.

and shite how she tracked him to smallville from all of these half remembered anecdotes from people not remotely connected to each other made zero fricking sense.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 6/25/13 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

And for the love of god, you don't have him making out with Lois with the city in smoldering ruins around him. That part was unforgivable (and stupid to boot)


Agreed.....he should have bent her over and given her the super dick!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram