Started By
Message

re: Tom Shatel: Shorter dimensions could bring balance to TDA Park

Posted on 6/20/13 at 4:54 pm to
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/20/13 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

The problem is, these aren't major-leaguers at the CWS.


I liken it to two major differences between the NFL/College.

Imagine going to your bowl game and playing the field with the same width in hash marks, but the narrower NFL goal posts, or requiring two feet in bounds for receptions.
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 6/20/13 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

I liken it to two major differences between the NFL/College.

Imagine going to your bowl game and playing the field with the same width in hash marks, but the narrower NFL goal posts, or requiring two feet in bounds for receptions.


This comparison makes absolutely no sense. In baseball all of the constants are remaining the same. The plate is still 17 inches wide. The mound is 60 feet 6 inches away and the bases are 90 feet apart. The outfield dimensions aren't identical in any 2 parks.

You are talking about actual rule changes with the narrower goal posts and 2 feet in bounds rule. There are specific rules on how wide the goal posts are. There are no rules or guidelines on how deep the OF fence has to be. Your comparison is like saying the CWS decides to use a 14 inch home plate, instead of 17 inches.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/20/13 at 6:33 pm to
quote:


Imagine going to your bowl game and playing the field with the same width in hash marks, but the narrower NFL goal posts, or requiring two feet in bounds for receptions.


Then I would be a high schooler suddenly playing a college football game.

College/NCAA goal posts measure 18 feet, 6 inches wide (the same as the NFL)

This isn't the 1980's or high school. The old NCAA goal posts were ridiculous like the old bats.

Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164342 posts
Posted on 6/21/13 at 3:00 am to
Narrower goal posts? What are you talking about Golfer.. It isn't 1990 anymore.

People talking about the ball seams being lower to reduce drag are also forgetting one point.. The ball won't be as easy to grip so pitchers will have less control and everyone won't look like an all American. It's kind of a joke that so many pitchers have ERAs in the low 2s or in the 1s. Also with so many team ERAs being below 3.

The decrease in grip will mean more hittable pitches.
This post was edited on 6/21/13 at 3:01 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram