- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Potential LAC/Boston deal, re: Pelicans
Posted on 6/15/13 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 6/15/13 at 7:06 pm
Supposedly Boston wants Bledsoe in this deal. If this happens, is Rondo for #6 possible?
Maybe throw in one out of GV, Smith,or Lopez to sweeten the deal?
Maybe throw in one out of GV, Smith,or Lopez to sweeten the deal?
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 7:15 pm
5
Posted on 6/15/13 at 7:10 pm to mm2316
quote:
Maybe throe in one out of GV, Smith,or Lopez to sweeten the deal?
Chalmette high curse. I told ya.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 7:16 pm to Gtothemoney
I did go to AJ for two years, if that helps my case at all.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 7:31 pm to mm2316
GV and #6 for rondo and 16 good deal for both teams IMO.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 7:58 pm to Whodatforlife21
How about Ryan Anderson for Rondo and No. 16? Works for both teams.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:06 pm to mattz1122
Not really interested in Rondo
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:10 pm to HeadyBrosevelt
Rondo would be fun to watch
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:23 pm to mattz1122
quote:
How about Ryan Anderson for Rondo and No. 16? Works for both teams.
That's trade rape.. I'd do that all day long. Rondo is a top 5 PG, no way Boston does that, maybe if we swap picks and send them Anderson..
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:28 pm to mm2316
Yeah, you have to take Rondo & 16 for GV & 6.
Where does Bledsoe come into play in all that? I don't see what the Clips are getting out of it to make them want to give up Bledsoe.
Where does Bledsoe come into play in all that? I don't see what the Clips are getting out of it to make them want to give up Bledsoe.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:33 pm to Suntiger
The Celtics are giving Garnett and Doc Rivers (not technically part of the trade) to the Clippers.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:35 pm to mm2316
GV, Lopez and next years unprotected 1st for Rondo and #16. That deal saves Boston about 6mil next year. Plus the contracts gives them options. The Pels benefit is obvious.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:39 pm to BayouFann
quote:LENSANITY BABY!!!!!!!!!!!
GV, Lopez and next years unprotected 1st for Rondo and #16. That deal saves Boston about 6mil next year. Plus the contracts gives them options. The Pels benefit is obvious.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:40 pm to BayouFann
There's virtually no realistic deal where I would give an unprotected pick in next year's draft.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 8:46 pm to Fun Bunch
I would, but certainly not for a player that may very well be out until the All Star break. When you're trading two key contributors for one player that will be out of commission, it would be a terrible decision to include an unprotected pick in a loaded draft when you're not going to reap the benefits of the trade until late in the season. That's especially true when your team probably won't win more than 35 games (which would be the case for us if Rivers starts at PG for 3 months).
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:06 pm to mm2316
How does the board feel about the threat of Dwight and CP3 teaming up in LA? I definitely didn't want to see it happen in Houston, but if they don't get a young star to join them I feel their window of contention would be closing as ours is opening so I'm not that concerned.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:15 pm to TigerinATL
quote:I fricking despise the clippers so anything positive that happens to them deeply saddens me. although this trade would get rid of the main reason I dislike the clippers so i'm conflicted
How does the board feel about the threat of Dwight and CP3 teaming up in LA? I definitely didn't want to see it happen in Houston, but if they don't get a young star to join them I feel their window of contention would be closing as ours is opening so I'm not that concerned.
eta: if they team up Atlanta would be my preference. keep that noise in the east
This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:25 pm to BayouFann
I wouldn't want to trade next years unprotected first. The #6 this year? Yes. Next years pick? No!
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:34 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
There's virtually no realistic deal where I would give an unprotected pick in next year's draft.
I would. People are so excited about the hyped up draft next year there has to be someone over valuing it. And at some point you gotta start adding some vets. Though I don't like the deal mentioned here
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:38 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
How does the board feel about the threat of Dwight and CP3 teaming up in LA?
I think they'd be a good team wherever they joined up, but I would have a hard time seeing them putting a complete enough team to be a real contender. There's only so many good role players in the league. The Heat, with the best player in the world along with some decent role players, are having a hard time against a more complete Spurs team, and had a hard time against a pretty complete Pacers team last round.
Posted on 6/15/13 at 9:40 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:goddamn right
LENSANITY BABY!!!!!!!!!!!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News