- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hedge fund manager Daniel J. Arbess calls for direct money printing to Treasury
Posted on 5/20/13 at 8:46 am to Doc Fenton
Posted on 5/20/13 at 8:46 am to Doc Fenton
quote:agree
This would be a more honest way to pay for government expenditure
quote:But do you have any concern that funding the treasury this way could lead to even bigger stimulus packages in future economic downturns instead of across the board tax cuts? Which inevitably involves a lot of picking winners and losers. Or do you think this method wouldn't affect the ratio of tax cuts to stimulus much? I have little faith that future politicians will collectively vote to give themselves less power and pass on opportunities to play santa clause when they can convince voters it's in response to a "crisis".
rather than to pick winners and losers
quote:so the argument is that this should only be done the event of a financial crisis? To increase the money supply more quickly via tax cuts, instead of through the banks? At what point would you distinguish staving off a crisis from returning to the standard practice, near zero interest rates, etc, to combat a lagging economy following the crisis, and who would decide that? If it's at the fed's option, then I agree it would likely be a much better method for injecting money into the real economy, but if it's a standing option for congress, that distinction seems suspiciously arbitrary to me.
subsidize the financial industry while creating odd pockets of asset price bubbles
Posted on 5/20/13 at 10:09 am to el duderino III
quote:
At what point would you distinguish staving off a crisis from returning to the standard practice, near zero interest rates, etc, to combat a lagging economy following the crisis, and who would decide that?
Huh? I'm not really following that sentence, but the idea is to keep interest rates at a healthy level until the threat of a deflationary collapse is gone. (EDIT: and to keep them at a healthy level after, never having to resort to ZIRP)
When do you know when to stop? Easy. Whenever inflation returns.
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 10:18 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News