Started By
Message

re: Gordon back to Clippers a possibility? (not for CP3)

Posted on 5/13/13 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32987 posts
Posted on 5/13/13 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Good God please no. I'd rather roll the dice on Gordon than have to watch another terrible offensive year. Jordan is freaking garbage and there is a reason they want to get rid of him.


I think the thinking is Bledsoe, Austin and Davis provide the offense. Use Jordan as a defensive 5 who can get an ally oop here or there and find a starting 3 in the draft or FA. That would be opposed to Gordon and Rivers sharing time and being the only guys besides Davis to provide offense.

I know why this idea is hated, but it does kind of set four of the starting five spots.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 5/13/13 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

I think the thinking is Bledsoe, Austin and Davis provide the offense

quote:

Austin

quote:

provide the offense






I like Rivers think he'll be good down the road, but we can't rely on him to be an offensive option next year. I hope he can prove me wrong but he's still got a long way to go
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34370 posts
Posted on 5/13/13 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

I know why this idea is hated, but it does kind of set four of the starting five spots.


Not really. The trade brings in a backup PG and a terribly inefficient center, while sending out a starting SG and arguably better center. I don't see how that trade improves us in any way.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram