Started By
Message

re: Jurassic Park 4 on Hold

Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:03 am to
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150867 posts
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Can you at least make an argument.

Sure, but let's not ignore the fact that you've made zero arguments as to why you think they're "terrible."

Were they as good as the original? Of course not. I thought they were pretty solid for sequels though. I thought two was good even though I didn't like the end (in the city). And there were other parts of 2 that were stupid (like the gymnastic black daughter), but all in all it was pretty good. I actually thought 3 was really solid, especially for a third installment. I liked some of the new dinosaurs they introduced, and the settings (I thought the birdcage thing was cool). Aside from some campy-ish stuff (like being able to communicate with raptors) I thought it was pretty well-done, and could've been longer (it seemed really short).

Of course, I went into them not expecting them to live up to the original, because that would've been stupid. But IMO for sequels, they did a good job.
This post was edited on 5/8/13 at 10:04 am
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22504 posts
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Were they as good as the original? Of course not. I thought they were pretty solid for sequels though.
Agree 100%.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram