- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jurassic Park 4 on Hold
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:03 am to boom roasted
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:03 am to boom roasted
quote:
Can you at least make an argument.
Sure, but let's not ignore the fact that you've made zero arguments as to why you think they're "terrible."
Were they as good as the original? Of course not. I thought they were pretty solid for sequels though. I thought two was good even though I didn't like the end (in the city). And there were other parts of 2 that were stupid (like the gymnastic black daughter), but all in all it was pretty good. I actually thought 3 was really solid, especially for a third installment. I liked some of the new dinosaurs they introduced, and the settings (I thought the birdcage thing was cool). Aside from some campy-ish stuff (like being able to communicate with raptors) I thought it was pretty well-done, and could've been longer (it seemed really short).
Of course, I went into them not expecting them to live up to the original, because that would've been stupid. But IMO for sequels, they did a good job.
This post was edited on 5/8/13 at 10:04 am
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:53 am to CocomoLSU
quote:Agree 100%.
Were they as good as the original? Of course not. I thought they were pretty solid for sequels though.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News