Started By
Message

re: NBA has voted "NO" to Relocation of Sacramento Kings

Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:08 pm to
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3115 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:08 pm to
I think the NBA did the right thing. Sacramento has been a good market for the team for most of the last 25 years. They had a group that wanted to keep the team in its location, and I feel that the default should always be to keep a team where it is.

Clearly Seattle got screwed with the move to OKC, but that doesn't mean the right move now is to screw Sacramento.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34820 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:54 pm to
Do the Kings still play in that 'temporary' building they occupied when they moved into Sacramento?
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
7631 posts
Posted on 5/1/13 at 10:49 pm to
I'd like the Sonics back, but I mean this was it for Sacramento. City wasn't getting another chance. Too small market.

Seattle will get something eventually.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram