Started By
Message

re: stills vs toon

Posted on 4/27/13 at 7:55 pm to
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64468 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Nick Toon's extra year of "experience" means nothing.


I wouldn't go that far. You know as well as i that the 1st year is tough on any rookie. He (Toon) will know what to expect unlike the rooks. But talent will win out in the end.
Just ask Pittman
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 7:59 pm to
Pittman. That's who I was talking about.

And yes, too many people undervalue the ability to adjust to the NFL in the first place. Toon has done so.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49519 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't go that far


He was placed on IR after a totally uneventful preseason. Once on IR, you can't practice, even if healthy. So he certainly watched film and got advice, but that doesn't come close to overcoming the fact that (IMO) Stills is an outright more talented player.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram