Started By
Message

re: Why does everyone assume Vaccaro is Harpers replacement

Posted on 4/26/13 at 9:57 am to
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Posted by Patrick O Rly IAQ at FS. Vaccaro at SS. Jenkins at CB. Harper in Siberia.


I'd be fine with this..but I thought Vaccaro was more of a FS? I thought his strong suit was coverage at the S or nickel spot? Why would he be a SS who could come up support the run?
Posted by HollierThanThou
Member since Jan 2012
6209 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Why would he be a SS who could come up support the run?


Because Patrick loves him some IAQ
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:02 am to
quote:

I'd be fine with this..but I thought Vaccaro was more of a FS? I thought his strong suit was coverage at the S or nickel spot? Why would he be a SS who could come up support the run?


He's good in run support as well, but the SS/FS differences are being blurred if not completely done away with. In my thinking you want your two best safeties on the field.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166500 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Patrick O Rly


dude you missed it, we got vaccaro.
Posted by mm2316
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Aug 2010
6942 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:05 am to
quote:

It would be wonderful to have two starting safeties that can cover

Agree, Patrick (welcome back, btw).

I think some people read that KV can cover, and automatically want to put him at FS. Having a SS that can cover would be a huge upgrade.

Putting Vaccaro at FS, would only upgrade one position, still leave a hole at SS, and waste IAQ. Putting Vaccaro at SS gives you a SS who can actually cover and come up and stop the run, and allows you to use IAQ at FS- who's shown he can actually make plays on the ball (2 INTs in limited playing time last year vs. Jenkins' 3 picks in 3 years as a full time starter).
This post was edited on 4/26/13 at 10:07 am
Posted by GeauxDat1207
Houston,TX
Member since Oct 2011
13 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:12 am to
quote:

This is not Madden. It is a pretty hard for a player to just move positions and be successful. Putting on 25 pounds in an offseason and being asked to compete at a position players have been playing all their career is a whole lot to ask!


First, I don't play Madden. Second - did you see how much Harper played in the box last year in the second half of games? He was always up at the line of scrimmage. He's been stopping the run all his career so I don't think OLB would be that big of an adjustment. in a 3-4 Defense OLB speed is exactly what we are going to need, and the transition will be asking most of our players to do different things than they've been accustomed to in the past.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:35 am to
It's one thing to be an in the box safety with actual linebackers and linemen taking on blocks. Harper is 200 lbs. He would have to at least pack on 20-25 lbs, and even then he'd be lite in the arse for an olb. Assuming he has the frame for it, what do you think that would do to his already limited speed?
Posted by OzChuffnugg
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2010
1469 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:40 am to
quote:

First, I don't play Madden. Second - did you see how much Harper played in the box last year in the second half of games? He was always up at the line of scrimmage. He's been stopping the run all his career so I don't think OLB would be that big of an adjustment. in a 3-4 Defense OLB speed is exactly what we are going to need, and the transition will be asking most of our players to do different things than they've been accustomed to in the past.


I have seen him coming up in the box all his career. Harper has been good in run support, but also he is using his speed coming up from the safety position. In a 3-4 you hope your big linemen take up blockers, but as an OLB your are going to have big tackles coming to block you. Unless he puts on that 25 pounds you were talking about, and/or develops moves to shed the blocks he is going to spend a lot of time on his back getting direct attention from an Olinemen. If he puts on that 25 lbs it will likely be tough to keep the speed.
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:41 am to
Admittedly, I'm a simple guy. I don't study film, as perhaps you do. When I think of Jenkins, the image that comes to mind is the game where he chased down a WR and prevented a TD, and the opponent didn't score. He hustles, and he has talent. He has not however lived up to expectations. When I think of Harper, I think of a good guy, a hard worker, good tackler, but who is always a step (or 2, or 3, or more) behind whomever he's trying to cover, and I remember him hitting Steve Smith late (like by 5 seconds late) in the end zone after he had been burned by him. Harper is past his prime and needs to go. Hire him as an asst. coach.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64478 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:47 am to
When I think of Jenkins, the image that comes to mind is the game where he chased down a WR and prevented a TD, and the opponent didn't score

Maybe I see the glass half full. Yes he has always had hustle.
But the fact is the receiver was wide open and got behind the guy who is there to prevent that play.
Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
6881 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:50 am to
Vaccaro at FS. Jenkins at SS or CB. Harper on sideline.
Posted by mm2316
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Aug 2010
6942 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Jenkins at SS

Would be a disaster. He would be worse at SS than he is at FS, and worse than Harper is at SS.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423383 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:57 am to
quote:

I don't study film, as perhaps you do.

for the record, nobody on here studies film
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56684 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:59 am to
quote:

And not Jenkins? Jenkins is the more useless of the two to me by a mile.



I think there is a pretty good chance that both of last year's safeties are gone by this time next year. I think they will both be on the team this year.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:00 am to
I'm on youtube taking notes right now.
Posted by ScoopAndScore
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2008
11982 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:07 am to
Harper and Jenkins both suck. We need safeties more than any other position.
Posted by hustleman
Walker
Member since Mar 2013
4 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:21 am to
Hopefully the Saints and Jets make a trade.

Harper and Ivory for 2013 second round pick.
Posted by ScoopAndScore
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2008
11982 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Hopefully the Saints and Jets make a trade.

Harper and Ivory for 2013 second round pick.






I would like this
Posted by MannyG
Member since Sep 2009
356 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:49 am to
Neither Jenkins or Harper will be on the team next year:

- We save about 5 million letting Harper go next year, only 1 million if we do it this year

- Jenkins is a FA who has a cap number over 4 million this season
Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
6881 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Would be a disaster. He would be worse at SS than he is at FS, and worse than Harper is at SS.


Please elaborate. Just curious why you feel this way.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram