Started By
Message

re: New Rifle/Optics or Old Rifle/Expensive Optics Help Me Decide

Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:02 am to
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10116 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:02 am to
I bought a nice scope a few years back and do not regret the decision at all. The scope cost more than the gun and I am perfectly fine with that. I bought a Swaro Z3 4-12x50 and love it. It retailed normally for $1300 but got it for a hair over $800 on black Friday.

Would I normally spend that much on a scope? No. However, I do believe in having one nice setup after getting this one. My other scopes are all Nikons.

Swarovoski Z3 4-12x50
Browning X-Bolt 300WSM
Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6395 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:59 am to
Time and time again we sold entire set ups with rifles that were cheaper than the optics... Most rifles shoot well and if they don't its typically the shooter, ammo and or optics. shite, couldn't count the number of times I'd put a 30mm Swarovski or Zeiss on a Tikka... what would burn my arse would be someone spending $1300 on a Sako or a Weatherby Accumark and stick a damn $300 scope on it.... Doesn't work well that way. Buy a good scope and put the best mounts you can afford on it. It will make all the difference in the world. I didn't use Schmidt and Bender in my reference b/c they are in the 2k range. They are better than the others no doubt, but 2k on a scope is a big pill to swallow for most. We generally put them on Accumarks, Sakos, Dakotas and some custom guns that came through like Jarretts and such.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram