Started By
Message

re: Is Jimmy Graham replacable in our offense?

Posted on 3/29/13 at 6:28 pm to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30137 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 6:28 pm to
saints without jimmy in '09 was still top flight, but everyone was younger and we had depth at receiving positions and a legit TE in shockey.

saints with jimmy and sproles was GSOT material even with aging players.

Gronk is the best in the league, we all can agree without the biased attitude. He can do two things you want, block and catch and he can do it exceptionally well.

I won't mind paying him gronk money though, but for more than gronk? I'm iffy on that.
Posted by Cajun Revolution
Member since Apr 2009
44671 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 6:32 pm to
As good as Drew is...I think it would help out if he had a #2 wideout with some size and speed to stretch the field. Lance Moore is a good #3. Morgan isn't proven or consistent.

I think players like Sproles and Graham would flourish even more if they weren't viewed as primary options every single play. It's been effective but this team really struggled this past year when they both were limited or out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram