Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

How can NCAA let schools lose money on

Posted on 3/28/13 at 2:59 pm
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
56312 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 2:59 pm
basketball tournament and bowl games.
This is pretty much the reason why LSU turned down CIT or CBI, because it's more of a pay for play.


LINK
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69116 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

A source close to the George Mason athletic department told ESPN.com that the school lost hundreds of thousands of dollars that were not reimbursed during its 2006 run to the Final Four. One of the culprits: The school still had to pay for hotel rooms even though it played its Sweet 16 and Elite Eight games in Washington D.C., just 20 miles from the school. However, it was a good trade off as George Mason professor concluded that the team's performance in the tournament that year was worth more than $677 million in free publicity to the school.


Posted by saturday
Pronoun (Baw)
Member since Feb 2007
7979 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:32 pm to
It wasn't free I thought
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
45070 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

How can NCAA let schools lose money onbasketball tournament and bowl games.


They really don't.

1)They aren't counting money that is given to the conference and the reallocated to the conference members, ex. LSU & the Peach Bowl.

2) The NCAA pays for 75 members to travel with the team, the school is chosing to bring coaches' families and other boosters on the school's dime.

3) Don't bitch about barely breaking even if you are hosting parties for your alumni in every city.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27454 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

George Mason professor concluded that the team's performance in the tournament that year was worth more than $677 million in free publicity to the school.


this is the point. these mofos are just bitching because they must be low on cash reserves. they will make money off this run even if they lose a few thousand on expenses they are getting millions worth of exposure
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
79087 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

However, it was a good trade off as George Mason professor concluded that the team's performance in the tournament that year was worth more than $677 million in free publicity to the school.


Knowing what I know about George Mason's Econ department, you can take that number as fact. Those guy know their shite over there.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69116 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

this is the point. these mofos are just bitching because they must be low on cash reserves. they will make money off this run even if they lose a few thousand on expenses they are getting millions worth of exposure



Yep. Also from the OP link.

quote:

FGCU will eventually see some nice return from merchandise royalties. Through Tuesday, the school said it had sold $148,904 worth of Eagles gear in March compared to a little more than $20,107 during the same period of time last year.


This post was edited on 3/28/13 at 4:38 pm
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22597 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 5:40 pm to
The CBI and CIT are jokes of a tournament that aren't run by the NCAA, so they have nothing to do with it
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61491 posts
Posted on 3/28/13 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

They really don't.

1)They aren't counting money that is given to the conference and the reallocated to the conference members, ex. LSU & the Peach Bowl.

2) The NCAA pays for 75 members to travel with the team, the school is chosing to bring coaches' families and other boosters on the school's dime.

3) Don't bitch about barely breaking even if you are hosting parties for your alumni in every city.


all that ^^^

plus being featured on TV for several hours during the run up and actual game are well worth any "losses" considering it would cost far more to advertise your school with traditional commercials.



so instead of a school crying that they "lost" $100k on a game (which is likely just bullshite maneuvering for taxes and such) it should be viewed as they spent $100k on a 3 hour commercial for their school.
This post was edited on 3/28/13 at 6:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram