- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Penalties
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:33 pm
Objectively, what do you think?
First one: no chance in hell was that a penalty.
Second one: I didn't think so, but I have seen softer penalties called in games all over the world.
That Moreno guy is a homer who should be ignored at all times, but I take Ian Darke seriously.
First one: no chance in hell was that a penalty.
Second one: I didn't think so, but I have seen softer penalties called in games all over the world.
That Moreno guy is a homer who should be ignored at all times, but I take Ian Darke seriously.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:34 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
First one: no chance in hell was that a penalty.
Second one was an absolute stone cold PK in my eyes.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:34 pm to Keys Open Doors
alexi just said it. sometimes you need a little luck. we got the luck we needed on that second no call because it was definitely a penalty.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:37 pm to theOG
Yeah, my natural bias is a preference for fewer penalties to be called. Curious to see what others thought.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:37 pm to Keys Open Doors
Could make a case for both. The second was probably a penalty, but I'm not going to analyze it. I'll enjoy it more if I think that Mexico got fricked.
I am definitely in the minority, but I thought that Moreno was pretty fair.
I am definitely in the minority, but I thought that Moreno was pretty fair.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:38 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
Yeah, my natural bias is a preference for fewer penalties to be called. Curious to see what others thought.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of PKs in games like that (close matches), but that was a PK every time. If that was against the US, we'd be going nuts.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:39 pm to joey barton
Thought the ref was very good before the penalty. He was fair and didn't fall for embellishment.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:39 pm to Keys Open Doors
I could see the second one going either way. I was surprised that it went the way it did.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:41 pm to Keys Open Doors
Second one was. I think it wasn't called partially bc the dude flopped and acted too much. It looked to me he over acted.
This post was edited on 3/26/13 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:42 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
Second one was an absolute stone cold PK in my eyes.
Edu didn't even come close to the ball on the second one.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:42 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
I think it wasn't called partially bc the dude flopped and acted too much.
i can definitely see that. when they go to ground when they are hit by a stiff breeze, the ref has to have that in the back of his mind. writhing around like you just had your leg cut off by a handsaw can't help either.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:44 pm to Keys Open Doors
First not a penalty, second should have been a penalty.
Mexico would have missed it anyway.
Mexico would have missed it anyway.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:45 pm to Keys Open Doors
How often do tackles from behind, in the box, not get called?
we got so fricking lucky.
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:45 pm to theOG
Om the second one im not sure the ref saw whose foot the ball came off of and when u see it pop out lkke it did im sure he assumed the defender got a touch on the ball bsfore the contact.
Shouldve been a pk but that late n a mafch that huge hard to give
Shouldve been a pk but that late n a mafch that huge hard to give
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:46 pm to Keys Open Doors
First: not a penalty
Second: definitely a PK
Second: definitely a PK
Posted on 3/26/13 at 11:47 pm to jefforize
I didn't see a good angle on the second one. I couldn't tell if it was a true tackle or a clash of bodies. Either way, the attacker didn't do himself any favors with the forward flop. The force of the tackle would take him backwards in that situation.
Posted on 3/27/13 at 12:14 am to NOTORlOUSD
Second one for sure, but the first was a good no call
Posted on 3/27/13 at 12:16 am to Bho
quote:
Second one was an absolute stone cold PK in my eyes.
No doubt.
Posted on 3/27/13 at 12:18 am to Interception
As someone who has been injured numerous times in soccer, the last thing I would do if injured is ROLL ON THE HURT LEG OVER AND OVER. I would NEVER give somebody the benefit of the call if they keep flopping on the hurt leg. Its an embellishment and mexico is known for it. That said, it was a PK. frick landscaping -

Posted on 3/27/13 at 12:33 am to Keys Open Doors
What about the foul called on Dempsey in their box on the header near-miss off a corner? I thought that was a terrible call at the moment but didn't get a clear view of replay. Didn't think he was off either.
Popular
Back to top

13







