- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Report Saints, Vikings, and Broncos trying to acquire Revis
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:34 pm to BlacknGold
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:34 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
harrahs sucks arse
one of the worst player's odds for blackjack in the country. 8 deck shoe, no surrender. Hate that place. I only go there for craps or to park.
I like the no smoke place in Ms. Can't remember the name. Been there once, and I'd like to go more.
0
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:36 pm to liquid rabbit
Well both guys are garbage, and I think ivory would like a bigger role
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:36 pm to liquid rabbit
quote:
both starting safeties, Chris Ivory, and multiple picks for Revis and probably a draft pick
Holy balls. No way in hell that should be done
depends on the picks (if this source is true). Both safeties are problems, so no loss there. Ivory is a bonus not a necessity. As long as it's not a 1st or a multitude of picks, I'm down for this trade
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:38 pm to 504hornets
Why would we give them multiple picks after giving them 3 potential starters? I imagine a pick would be involved.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:38 pm to Patrick O Rly
If multiple picks means a 3rd this yr and a 3rd next yr that can be bumped to a second if he makes the Pro Bowl then I will be happy with that.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:38 pm to 504hornets
I'm not objecting to the garbage safeties, but garbage safeties + Ivory + multiple picks + whatever salary he would command = untenable.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:40 pm to Patrick O Rly
Hey if they agree to just a 3rd this yr or just a 2nd for next yr I will jump on that trade.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:43 pm to liquid rabbit
Well we know ivory will most likely not want to come back cause he knows he has a much better chance to start somewhere else. Revis goal he wants to be on a great team, and wants a team with a very good offense.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:44 pm to 504hornets
So, do this rumor actually have legs to it?
Or is this likely just some made up rumor from someone you know?
Or is this likely just some made up rumor from someone you know?
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:55 pm to CocoLoco
I think this rumor has some leg to it, but it depends on what the jets want. Incarcerated Bob who first reported said the Broncos are talking to the jets about Revis rehab.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:56 pm to CocoLoco
quote:
So, do this rumor actually have legs to it?
I wouldn't be surprised if there were some legs. Never posted it since it was 3rd hand info that could easily change with a new DC, but a good friend of mine is friends with someone with the organization that got the ax right after Spags did. After he got let go, he told my friend that Revis and Reed were the two players they were planning to target. I was skeptical since it was about a week before word of Revis's availability came out, but maybe the teams were told about it before the media broke it. I still don't quite believe it all, but my friend isn't the type to bullshite me about that kind of thing, though.
Personally, I don't think that there's any way we could afford it cap wise. I do think that a lot of people are overestimating the type of picks/players it will take to acquire Revis, though. He's coming off the injury, will require a massive contract, and also has a no franchise clause in his contract (which I didn't previously think was possible).
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:56 pm to CocoLoco
Don't get sucked into the rumor mill, Rookie
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:59 pm to THRILLHO
Well if we can trade Harper and Jenkins we might have enough money to sign Reed to a cap friendly 2yr deal. Plus I think Brees will do something with his contract next offseason like Brady if we need him to.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 5:01 pm to 504hornets
I would be shocked if the Jets would be looking to acquire two of the worst safeties in the NFL, one of them at $11m over the next two seasons.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 5:02 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
I would love it if the Jets would be looking to acquire two of the worst safeties in the NFL, one of them at $11m over the next two seasons.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 5:03 pm to Breesus
quote:
Don't get sucked into the rumor mill, Rookie
I think it's nothing more than a rumor, but I'm always curious to hear if it could possibly be more
Posted on 3/1/13 at 5:08 pm to THRILLHO
Well people think that Jenkins and Harper might be better in Rob scheme. So maybe Rex thinks they can be good in his scheme.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 5:09 pm to 504hornets
If we send them those 3 players and if the multiple picks are any higher than a 5th then that defense better be a top ten.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 5:11 pm to 504hornets
quote:
Well people think that Jenkins and Harper might be better in Rob scheme
I think Harper definitely would, but I think Jenkins is a lost cause.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 5:12 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Jenkins might still make for a solid nickel back. I don't want to see him playing FS this year, though.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News