Started By
Message
locked post

it will get real tomorrow (LHSAA split meeting)

Posted on 2/20/13 at 6:45 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54982 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 6:45 pm
LINK

the select school principals will meet at the LHSAA office tomorrow

Archbishop Shaw's principal wants to see the select schools in 5 classifications come playoff time

the principal of the oldest high school in LA traded letters with Holy Cross on the best action to take. he thinks Catholic schools should not accept second-class status to the LHSAA or anyone else and warns it will extend to every sport eventually.

I wonder what the independent schools like Newman, Country Day, and St. Martin's think of all this? I can really see John Curtis being left without an association at the end of all this. Will they laugh at McDonogh, Miller McCoy, Clark, Ben Franklin, or Thomas Jefferson if they show up?

I also wonder who's gonna get the score ran up on them this fall.
This post was edited on 2/21/13 at 9:22 am
Posted by LaBornNRaised
Loomis blows
Member since Feb 2011
11013 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 7:37 pm to
Separating and joining with East Texas would be awesome!
Posted by bigcatfish
Member since Feb 2009
1283 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 9:10 am to
The meeting is taking place now.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104476 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 9:32 am to
This is going to be good.


There's enough of a core group of private / parochial / charter / magnet / lab schools in South LA that there could easily be an entire separate association without too many problems in the way of logistics.
Posted by geauxruston
RUSTON
Member since Apr 2009
4336 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:03 pm to
"Select" and "non-select" schools are not on the same playing field, and everybody knows that. There's no way a school of 250 kids can legally compete against a school that has over 1500.
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108128 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:15 pm to
Which is why there are classes you dolt.


Select schools declared this unconstitutional today
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104476 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Select schools declared this unconstitutional today


Which, in and of itself, doesn't mean much because public schools have the numbers within the LHSAA.

The signal that sends, though, is that the LHSAA better tread carefully because the private schools may be serious about a split if the LHSAA insists on "separate and unequal" only for the post-season.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
84402 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

The signal that sends, though, is that the LHSAA better tread carefully because the private schools may be serious about a split if the LHSAA insists on "separate and unequal" only for the post-season.



The most insane part of the "non-select" movement is that they want 5 champions from their group every year. Madness. If they were to agree to having 5 champs total (3 non-select and 2 select), I assume the select schools might stomach that.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115846 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:34 pm to
Privates should tell LHSAA to frick themselves and split off. LHSAA would change its tune real fricking quick.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104476 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Privates should tell LHSAA to frick themselves and split off. LHSAA would change its tune real fricking quick.


Which would be my tactic as well, but some may be hesitant to do that.

This is effectively going to come down to a north-south split, as the vast majority of "select" schools are in south LA due to the systemic problems within the public schools here. There's a shite-ton of private, parochial, charter, lab, magnet, etc., in BR and NOLA alone, let alone Hammond, Laffy, Lake Charles, etc.
This post was edited on 2/21/13 at 12:42 pm
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
37435 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

"Select" and "non-select" schools are not on the same playing field, and everybody knows that. There's no way a school of 250 kids can legally compete against a school that has over 1500.


You serious, Clark?
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:49 pm to
An article from todays Advocate regarding the meeting.

If there are really only 80 or so select schools, it seems kind of insane to break them up into 5 classes. That's like 16 schools per class.

I don't have extremely strong feelings one way or the other about the split. But I think it would be silly for the LHSAA to cave to schools threatening to take their ball and go home after a majority had voted. That would be letting the minority rule and encouraging similar behavior in the future for any group that can't get it's way through a vote of the majority.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29445 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

LHSAA better tread carefully because the private schools may be serious about a split if the LHSAA insists on "separate and unequal" only for the post-season.

I wish the privates would do this and then the public schools can go whining to the state legislature to fill their budget shortfalls when they're not splitting the gate with the private schools.
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
79104 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

But I think it would be silly for the LHSAA to cave to schools threatening to take their ball and go home after a majority had voted.


The vote was a sham. Why were class B and C schools voting on what happens in the football playoffs when they don't even have football teams?

And why wasn't it a roll call vote?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104476 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

The vote was a sham. Why were class B and C schools voting on what happens in the football playoffs when they don't even have football teams?


Because a lot of public schools threatened the B and C schools with the elimination of those classes if they didn't go along with this.
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
79104 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Because a lot of public schools threatened the B and C schools with the elimination of those classes if they didn't go along with this.


They shouldn't have been a target for threats because they shouldn't be voting on the issue in the first place.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

The vote was a sham. Why were class B and C schools voting on what happens in the football playoffs when they don't even have football teams? And why wasn't it a roll call vote?

If the vote was done against the rules then they should lodge the proper objections and I'm sure they will. But I still think it would be the worst kind of weakness for more than 3/4 of the schools to cave to less than 1/4 of the schools because they threaten to leave. If it's in their best interet to leave the LHSAA I'm sure they will. If it's in their best interest to stay, I'm sure they'll stay.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104476 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

But I still think it would be the worst kind of weakness for more than 3/4 of the schools to cave to less than 1/4 of the schools because they threaten to leave.


That 1/4 of the schools brings in an inordinate amount of the gate money for the LHSAA.

Expecting them to play non-select schools in district and then separating them for the playoffs is horseshite.


There's no reason why 5A public schools in New Orleans should be able to get huge gates from playing the entire Catholic League and then be able to avoid them completely in the playoffs.
Posted by geauxruston
RUSTON
Member since Apr 2009
4336 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 1:28 pm to
Plus all boys schools like Catholic (BR) and Jesuit have a huge advantage over schools like Ruston and Ouachita. When you have over 2,000 all boys at your school, how can we complete with that?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104476 posts
Posted on 2/21/13 at 1:31 pm to
I thought that single-sex schools got an adjustment in their enrollment numbers for classification purposes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram