Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid - Page 6 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Doc Fenton
LSU Fan
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2007
50726 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

It's time to fight back.


Have you seen our culture lately?

Fighting back is futile.

Time to start up an independent state somewhere in the Congo River Basin is what I say.






Back to top
jrodLSUke
LSU Fan
Tigerdroppings Premium
Member since Jan 2011
5049 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

It's actually a standard ruling.

...said the all white jury when convicting a black guy...






Back to top
brass2mouth
LSU Fan
Member since Jul 2007
12929 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Reading the judgment clears it up a lot, but it's still f'd up.



Nah man, soldier, marine, airman, sailor, fricking billy bob off the street it doesn't matter.

When the woman admits to purposefully conning you bc of what you do and the benefits she will receive and the judge still rules in her favor? Yeah that judge is a POS.






Back to top
Powerman
LSU Fan
Corpus Christi, TX
Member since Jan 2004
120338 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Paternity tests should be SOP at childbirth. Would clear up a lot of problems.

I'm not much for adding laws but I agree with this

100% of births should involve paternity testing

Women have been gaming the system for too long






Back to top
elposter
Alabama Fan
South Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
7699 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

In a perfect world, the following would happen:

* when an unmarried woman gives birth, she receives full custody and responsibility for the child, and legally speaking nobody gives a crap who the biological father is

* when a married woman gives birth, the husband receives full custody and responsibility for the child

* if the wife initiates a divorce, the husband has the choice of who gets custody, unless the wife is able to clearly establish objective fault (cheating; arrested for felony; etc.) by the husband, in which case she gets full custody plus child support

* if the husband initiates a divorce, the wife has the choice of who gets custody, unless the husband is able to clearly establish objective fault (cheating; arrested for felony; etc.) by the wife, in which case he gets full custody, but no child support

Problem solved.


A lot of problems here. There is no one size fits all solution. Individualized assessments and discretionary decisions will always have to be made.






Back to top
Doc Fenton
LSU Fan
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2007
50726 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Yeah that judge is a POS.


Please. Even if the judge erred, he's just doing what she thinks is legally required.

Getting married is serious business, bro.



This post was edited on 2/15 at 11:35 am


Back to top
willy76
Arizona State Fan
Tucson, AZ
Member since Jan 2013
7 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


these judges need to start being taught a lesson





Back to top
willy76
Arizona State Fan
Tucson, AZ
Member since Jan 2013
7 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


chics west of the Miss. are the biggest POS on the planet.





Back to top
brass2mouth
LSU Fan
Member since Jul 2007
12929 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Please. Even if the judge erred, she's just doing what she thinks is legally required.

Getting married is serious business, bro.


IF the judge erred? WTF?! Its blatantly obvious the judge erred.

The girl straight up conned the guy just for his benefits, how if that any different from the con artists that dupe people out of money?

The judge could have righted it all and said tough luck to the POS girl, but chose not to.






Back to top
NoHoTiger
LSU Fan
just left of center
Member since Nov 2006
33041 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Women beg for equality, and they pull this type shite.

Do not lump all women with this skank. Most of us work hard for what we have and would not dream of doing this to someone.








Back to top
Doc Fenton
LSU Fan
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2007
50726 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Individualized assessments and discretionary decisions will always have to be made.


You mean by the parents voluntarily? Sure.

As for the rest, having the default mode be clarity of parental control would go a long way toward clearing up this shite. The rest could be worked out by the parties themselves.






Back to top
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Women have been gaming the system for too long



When the system stacks the deck in favor of one gender, expect that other gender to increasingly reject the system.

Hence the rise in "adult adolescent males," which is really just a pejorative used to discourage that behavior, but despite that propaganda campaign, more and more men are finding life without committing to a woman more and more appealing.

And the secondary effect is that that actually makes women more willing to have sex without commitment. It's a feedback loop: Men don't commit. Women loosen. Men still don't commit. Women loosen even more.

Men can and will win this war of attrition.







Back to top
NoHoTiger
LSU Fan
just left of center
Member since Nov 2006
33041 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Then tricked him into marrying her for his military benefits.

Then he should have requested the paternity test at that time. If he only slept with her once and she claimed she was pregnant less than 3 weeks later, that should have sent up a red flag as well.

The law needs to be changed and until it is, more cases like this are going to happen.

STOP frickING AROUND WITHOUT CONDOMS






Back to top
C
LSU Fan
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Dec 2007
21007 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Men can and will win this war of attrition










Back to top
Zoltan
New Orleans Saints Fan
BR
Member since May 2010
817 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

I'm sorry but this is the saddest damn thing I've ever read. Where are we as a nation when we're forcing people to pay for other peoples children?? What does this say to other women? It says it's perfectly legal to use a child to extort money from someone. The woman should be prosecuted and the real father should be made to pay for his child.

There is no justice here.


This sounds a whole lot like welfare.... Interdasting....






Back to top
R2Z2
Member since Dec 2012
115 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


Nomarriage.com





Back to top
teke184
LSU Fan
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
7878 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:


This sounds a whole lot like welfare.... Interdasting....


That's exactly what it is.

Plenty of cases out there where a man has been made to pay for a child that is proven not to be his by DNA, yet the courts insisted that he be on the hook because it is in "the child's best interests" for them to be supported financially.

Same deal with the guy who supplied baby-batter and an applicator that looked like Jodie Foster's knuckles to a lesbian couple for no payment and an agreement that he was not to be responsible for the child and then got stuck with a support bill when the partner ditched the birth mother.



This post was edited on 2/15 at 11:47 am


Back to top
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:




yea i thought that was pretty clever too!






Back to top
R2Z2
Member since Dec 2012
115 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


Divorce law in US = man loses.

Usually women ball buster judges and man bends over.






Back to top
Doc Fenton
LSU Fan
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2007
50726 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

And the secondary effect is that that actually makes women more willing to have sex without commitment. It's a feedback loop: Men don't commit. Women loosen. Men still don't commit. Women loosen even more.

Men can and will win this war of attrition.


It sounds an awful lot like permanent cultural decline via androgyny.






Back to top


Back to top




//