Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid - Page 5 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Eighteen
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2006
16471 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

She's unfit to be a mom. They should take the baby from her and give the soldier the option of keeping the baby as the father or giving it up for adoption.


This. Would the solider have any chance at custody here?






Back to top
teke184
LSU Fan
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
8134 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

She's unfit to be a mom. They should take the baby from her and give the soldier the option of keeping the baby as the father or giving it up for adoption.


Her mother is another piece of work, too.

Any chance he could have them prosecuted for fraud and conspiracy if they insist on child support?







Back to top
scooter1973
LSU Fan
Morgan City
Member since Oct 2010
105 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

This story would be shocking, but the bitches name is CRYSTAL!!!! Never, ever trust a bitch named Crystal. You've been warned.



THIS!!!!






Back to top
Kracka
North Carolina Fan
Broussard
Member since Aug 2004
28582 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


No guy in this situation every thinks the child is not his, until the woman gets caught fricking around, or a divorce comes into the picture. I get why the judge made the ruling, laws are laws. There are plenty of stupid laws that frick over people on the regular. Although, logic has to come into play her and the guy should not be forced to pay her shite. I don't see how the all powerful military can't get him out of it.





Back to top
volgolf
Tennessee Fan
Member since Sep 2005
63 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

The divorce announcement coming the day after the kid's birth-

LINK /


The rumor mill on the divorce and the kid's parentage-

LINK /

This isn't the only outlet alleging that Jason Richardson was plowing Mrs. Nash and that he's the babydaddy.



Rumor on Nash looks false to me based upon these pics:

Steve Nash







Back to top
fisherbm1112
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
4577 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


Is there any article on what the judge said? I know the verdict just would like to see how the conversation was in the courtroom. I have a feeling it was awfully tense.





Back to top
Tmacelroy12
LSU Fan
Houston
Member since Aug 2012
5489 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


That is one black baby





Back to top
Mo Jeaux
LSU Fan
NYC
Member since Aug 2008
12677 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Rumor on Nash looks false to me based upon these pics:


Right. I think the true story is that Nash was the one fricking around and decided to get rid of the ball and chain.






Back to top
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
37742 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Paternity tests should be SOP at childbirth. Would clear up a lot of problems.



womens rights groups....and liberals argue that this is not in the best interest of the child because more men would leave their wife instead of being cuckolds.

I shite you not. Think about that. You DONT HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW IF YOURE BEING CUCKOLDED.






Back to top
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
37742 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

This. Would the solider have any chance at custody here?


interestingly, he cant establish paternity without adopting.

he cant even take custody of the child.

he just gets to PAY.






Back to top
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
62466 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


O, IC:

quote:

The Court found Crystal Parsons’ testimony to be totally untrustworthy. It called her actions in deliberately lying to Brandon about being the father of the child “despicable.” In his written opinion, Judge Pollack states his views as follows: “The court denies the motions of Respondent Brandon Parsons to set aside Judgment and order blood testing to determine paternity. The motions are statutorily untimely under Family Code Section 2122, 7646,7541 and C.C.P. Section 473. The Paternity determination set forth within the 2009 martial dissolution judgment stipulated to by father, is res judicata and not subject to an equitable set aside.”

The court concludes that the Father was, in fact, despicably duped and victimized by Petitioner Crystal Parsons’ fraudulent concealment regarding biological paternity, a deception which has placed a significant, continuing financial burden upon the Father. Existing law, however, as applied to the facts of this case, precludes the court from setting aside the prior paternity determination. Unless the law is changed in this area, the fact pattern in this case represents the rare situation where the jurisprudence maxims of Civil Code Section 3517 (“No one can take advantage of [her] own wrong.”) and Civil Code Section 3523 (“For every wrong there is a remedy.”) are, regrettably, untrue.
****
During his divorce proceedings in November 2008, he signed a waiver of his rights under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. This Act would have tolled all statutes of limitation against him, but since it had been waived, we had to argue for relief under the court’s equitable powers. Unfortunately, Judge Pollack refused to exercise his powers of equity and right this wrong.


The Judgment:
LINK




This post was edited on 2/15 at 11:03 am


Back to top
Eighteen
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2006
16471 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

quote:

This. Would the solider have any chance at custody here?


interestingly, he cant establish paternity without adopting.

he cant even take custody of the child.

he just gets to PAY.


this is just insane to me.

seriously






Back to top
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
37742 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

this is just insane to me.

seriously


just google men's rights...reddit has a nice community too.

Get involved, we need more men to not just read these stories, but start to stand up for our own reproductive, child custody, and support rights.

Unfortunately the lib womens groups have a long history already in the courts and with politicians.

Get involved dude. I am, and we need more help.

Anyone reading this thread, if this pisses you off...get involved with men's rights. It's time to fight back.






Back to top
noonan
USA Fan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
27025 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


The guy should seek full custody of the kid. She's obviously an unfit mother.

And when the judge throws it out stating that he's not even the father of the kids he should be like







Back to top
elposter
Alabama Fan
South Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
7757 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

$1,377 per month, approximately one-third of his income


Disregarding the paternity issue that has been discussed. The judge also fricked him on the amount. That's an extrememly high child support payment, particularly given his income. The woman must not have a job because the judge is basically requiring him to pay the FULL amount to raise the child and assuming no contribution from the mother.






Back to top
0jersey
LSU Fan
Paradise
Member since Sep 2006
625 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


There are times in life when bad people have to die and sometimes innocent lives are lost in the process. This is one of those times.

If it was me, this problem would be solved. I could live with guilt.






Back to top
RunningBlake
USA Fan
Member since Aug 2011
1898 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


Glad I got clipped. Frickin skank





Back to top
brass2mouth
LSU Fan
Member since Jul 2007
12974 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


The judge is a bigger POS than the girl and her family IMO.





Back to top
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
62466 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

The judge is a bigger POS than the girl and her family IMO.

Reading the judgment clears it up a lot, but it's still f'd up.






Back to top
Doc Fenton
Yale Fan
Member since Feb 2007
50726 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Paternity tests should be SOP at childbirth. Would clear up a lot of problems.


Ehhh, that's a little weird to me.

In a perfect world, the following would happen:

* when an unmarried woman gives birth, she receives full custody and responsibility for the child, and legally speaking nobody gives a crap who the biological father is

* when a married woman gives birth, the husband receives full custody and responsibility for the child

* if the wife initiates a divorce, the husband has the choice of who gets custody, unless the wife is able to clearly establish objective fault (cheating; arrested for felony; etc.) by the husband, in which case she gets full custody plus child support

* if the husband initiates a divorce, the wife has the choice of who gets custody, unless the husband is able to clearly establish objective fault (cheating; arrested for felony; etc.) by the wife, in which case he gets full custody, but no child support

Problem solved.






Back to top


Back to top




//