Started By
Message

re: I'm thinking the Rob Ryan "hire" was bad information

Posted on 2/7/13 at 11:51 am to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166498 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Glazer tweet simply implied that he's the leading candidate, not that they plan on hiring him.


I understand the slight differences. It's hard to factually distinguish a "plan to hire" and "leading candidate and his job to lose" basically if the end result is Ryan is hired. The reports don't bother so much as why is he the leading candidate with his track record and without even an interview, plus why is it taking like 2 weeks to even interview?
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 11:56 am to
quote:

The reports don't bother so much as why is he the leading candidate with his track record and without even an interview, plus why is it taking like 2 weeks to even interview?


Because while his track record may not be great, it's better than Grantham and whoever else they're attempting to hire, which is a position coach. In my view we'll hire Ryan if we're not convinced by the other two. In other words, I don't think leading candidate = first choice. It's more of the "safe" one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram