Started By
Message

re: The lease question

Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:23 pm to
Posted by nogoodjr
Member since Feb 2006
802 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

You'd pay 35 an acre minimum for that here


No I wouldn't. Couldn't spend that kinda money. Can't understand anyone paying that. If you lease a small 150 acre tract it would cost over 5k without stands or improvements. You could go on two fully guided whitetail hunts with a good shot at killing a 130-150 deer for that price.

And have no worries. No building stands, putting up posted signs ect. Plus, you wouldn't be hunting the same 150 acres over and over.

Can someone explain.
Posted by 34venture
Buffer Zone
Member since Mar 2010
11369 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

No I wouldn't. Couldn't spend that kinda money. Can't understand anyone paying that. If you lease a small 150 acre tract it would cost over 5k without stands or improvements. You could go on two fully guided whitetail hunts with a good shot at killing a 130-150 deer for that price.

And have no worries. No building stands, putting up posted signs ect. Plus, you wouldn't be hunting the same 150 acres over and over.

Can someone explain.



Because I would go bat shite crazy if I only got to hunt twice a year.
Posted by Capt ST
Hotel California
Member since Aug 2011
12887 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Can someone explain.


I know of a section in central LA that went for 55k. 55000/640=85.93/acre. I hear they may have a lodge that was on a lake up until this week available too.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram