Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison - Page 4 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
jmarto1
LSU Fan
Houma, LA
Member since Mar 2008
14069 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison








Back to top
  Replies (0)
Tigah in the ATL
LSU Fan
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
24848 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech
There are plenty of laws that legally & constitutionally restrict the freedom of speech.

Since you seem to not understand this, how can there be intelligent discussion on the topic?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
2873 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

I'm overlooking the bestiality part of this because he is on trial for obscenity. Not having sex with animals


I don't understand all of the cons on this board who are outraged at the feds for taking away this guys freedom over eating crap but are all about the state taking his rights away for poling a dog. WTF??? That is some sick twisted crap for certain, but who is the state of California to tell me what I can and can't do with MY PROPERTY??? What harm is there in fornicating with a Goat? Have you ever seen how Goats are treated at a processing plant? Trust me, if I am a goat and my choice is Percy the Perve with a penchant for Goat buggery or the local Hormel packing plant me and Percy are about to become the best of friggin' buddies! Seriously...walk down your grocery stores poultry aisle and then meander over to your local chicken grower and watch that operation awhile. You would well understand that Michael Vick was a lover of animals like no other. Yes, blowing a donkey is disgusting, but what is the harm in it for the donkey? Loading him up with about 2/3 of his body weight and forcing him to walk across the desert or having some ugly Hispanic chick blow him. Which is crueler?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
CITWTT
LSU Fan
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


So we are supposed to believe that in a six sentence or so synopsis of a SEVEN YEAR trial we have been given all of the facts? I think not my friend, but to use his own idioms. Why should I give a scat?





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Tchefuncte Tiger
LSU Fan
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
23046 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


Yay! Another sick pervert who's now a Free Speech Martyr.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
ugasickem
Georgia Fan
I'm on a Boat!
Member since Nov 2010
5648 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

I don't agree with this. If he violated any law with the bestiality, he should be tried for this.






Back to top
cwill
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Jan 2005
24547 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

What is the speech that needs to be protected? What is his statement? And don't give me the bull shite that was reported he claimed during court in the article.


Why does speech have to have a point or be some specific statement, in your view, in order to be protected by the 1st?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Rex
LSU Fan
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
55038 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


The bestiality definitely should be punished. Smearing shite on a willing person definitely not.






Back to top
Rickety Cricket
Navy Fan
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
34663 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


I'll agree with his conviction when the Governmet shows one person that was injured due to the man's films.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
N.O. via West-Cal
LSU Fan
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
4172 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


This really isn't that surprising.

1. It has NEVER been the case that all speech is utterly free from restraint. Defamation; yelling "fire" in a crowded theater, etc.

2. For decades, we have known that according to the Suprem Court, "obscenity" may be regulated. I am not a big fan of this exception because it is so slippery. It is the concept of "obscenity" - not pornography - that prompted the famous "I know when it when I see it" comment. But someone operating on the edge of the porn industry had better know that obscenity can be regulated and act accordingly.

Not the kind of thing I want prosecutors and law enforcement spending time on, but this is far from shocking.






Back to top
SidewalkDawg
Georgia Fan
North Georgia
Member since Nov 2012
856 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

The bestiality definitely should be punished. Smearing shite on a willing person definitely not.


I understand that bestiality is illegal in some states. But can someone tell me why one is tolerated and the other condemned? I mean they are both insanely disgusting acts.

Why do some on here say he should be let go for eating/smearing shite on someone, but if he fricked an animal (an act that presumably neither harms the person nor the animal), everyone goes bananas?

Is it truly because an animal can't "Consent" to the act? If the animal lifted it's tail and laid down, would that act then be considered consent?






Back to top
LSURussian
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
81152 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

the people that caused financial collapse hide behind the masks of banks and corporations while getting bailed out, the opposite of going to jail.

What laws did they violate?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Zach
LSU Fan
Member since May 2005
63816 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

We have a lot of conservatives on this board that claim to love the constitution. Surely they'll be against this, right?


I'm against it. As long as no dogs were harmed. I don't care about goats, sheep or horses.






Back to top
CITWTT
LSU Fan
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


Zach, a little interesting article to read was on the net on a dog in Italy that daily attends church where his owners funeral was held. He quietly sits through the services.





Back to top
Zach
LSU Fan
Member since May 2005
63816 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


Saw it. And he looks very much like my older dog.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

1. It has NEVER been the case that all speech is utterly free from restraint. Defamation; yelling "fire" in a crowded theater, etc.


Don't you think that goes against what the 1st amendment clearly states?

At least prior to the 14th amendment and incorporation of the 1st, states could write into their own constitutions whatever exceptions they wanted to speech.

But let's just be intellectually honest here, the 1st amendment clearly states "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." Why do you feel justified in allowing them to make some laws?






Back to top
LSURussian
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
81152 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

But let's just be intellectually honest here, the 1st amendment clearly states "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." Why do you feel justified in allowing them to make some laws?
Congress didn't make those laws. That is how the Supreme Court interpreted the 1st amendment to be applied.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Trauma14
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2010
3072 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

We have a lot of conservatives on this board that claim to love the constitution. Surely they'll be against this, right?


I a pretty big conservative and am 100% against this.

I don't believe in abortion, but it should be legal for those who do. I absolutely hate flag burning hippies, but they have a right to protest. I think homosexuality is disgusting, immoral, and plain freaking stupid, but I don't care if they get married and receive tax benefits.

When will people realize that not all people must live under the standard of morality and beliefs, just that all people deserve the same protection of their beliefs as they want of their own?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
N.O. via West-Cal
LSU Fan
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
4172 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


"But let's just be intellectually honest here, the 1st amendment clearly states "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." Why do you feel justified in allowing them to make some laws?"

I agree with you on putting incorporation aside because the First Amendment applies to the states, too.

As for your question, this is just where logical extremists struggle to understand that things simply are not - and never were - so black and white. All of the examples mentioned - defamation, yelling fire in a crowded theater, and many more - were clearly understood as being within the legitimate power of government to regulate at the time the First Amendment was drafted. Some things are crystal clear, such as giving a speech favoring one candidate over teh other. Others are not so clear at all, such as figuring out whether you gave the speech at a time, in a place, or in a manner that the government could regulate (think bullhorns, late at night, etc.). So, the answer to your question is OF COURSE restrictions of any kind on speech appear to be in conflict with the literal wording of the First Amendment (as incorporated by the 14th) to the States.






Back to top
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

As for your question, this is just where logical extremists struggle to understand that things simply are not - and never were - so black and white. All of the examples mentioned - defamation, yelling fire in a crowded theater, and many more - were clearly understood as being within the legitimate power of government to regulate at the time the First Amendment was drafted. Some things are crystal clear, such as giving a speech favoring one candidate over teh other. Others are not so clear at all, such as figuring out whether you gave the speech at a time, in a place, or in a manner that the government could regulate (think bullhorns, late at night, etc.). So, the answer to your question is OF COURSE restrictions of any kind on speech appear to be in conflict with the literal wording of the First Amendment (as incorporated by the 14th) to the States.


and all I'm saying is that if you're going to have a litany of exceptions, then put them in the damn constitution/amendment.






Back to top


Back to top