- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attorney Question???
Posted on 1/18/13 at 11:19 am to OTIS2
Posted on 1/18/13 at 11:19 am to OTIS2
Im not looking at it as this guy is going to get an excess judgment against him. We all know those circumstances are slim. If Im naming the policy the car was under, Im naming the owner of the vehicle. Plain as that. Go file a MSJ and get him out if its a slam dunk.
Im not risking anything when Im naming parties to a lawsuit
Im not risking anything when Im naming parties to a lawsuit
This post was edited on 1/18/13 at 11:20 am
1
Posted on 1/18/13 at 11:56 am to Dr. 3
I do about 1 pecent defense work...but if I did more, and your client filed that claim against my owner, I'd be most pleased to file that MSJ, get my dismissal with an award of court cost(which we both know would exceed $1000.00 in most parishes), and I'd collect from your client's ultimate recovery. Since I do 99 percent PI work, and I don't wish to explain to a disgruntled client why he owes those costs (and I don't care to eat the expense myself), I don't sue owners without factual support. I can always add one if discovery generates the basis for amendment.
This post was edited on 1/18/13 at 12:17 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News