- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tigerbait's Updated Top 30 in LA
Posted on 1/16/13 at 1:49 pm to TigerFanNKaty
Posted on 1/16/13 at 1:49 pm to TigerFanNKaty
HMMMMM.......Williams at 11???? Head scratcher.
Hwo does a kid be ranked 11 in state but 89 nationally and higher than kids that are better in state????
I cant figure thsi out. The state ranking are useless if the national numbers are different.
Hwo does a kid be ranked 11 in state but 89 nationally and higher than kids that are better in state????
I cant figure thsi out. The state ranking are useless if the national numbers are different.
3
Posted on 1/16/13 at 1:53 pm to Tiger Phanatick
There's a bunch of different groups that rate and rank rivals.
Posted on 1/16/13 at 1:55 pm to Tiger Phanatick
quote:
The state ranking are useless if the national numbers are different.
i think i would agree more with state rankings than national rankings as far as where they are....state can be more accurate due to ppl that are making the list are from here and see them play and see off the field things....national rankings are a little broad and do not reflect much on players improvements...IMO
Posted on 1/16/13 at 3:55 pm to Tiger Phanatick
quote:
I cant figure thsi out. The state ranking are useless if the national numbers are different.
No... It's when the local guys disagree with the national guys, but I agree Tim Williams is unfairly too low.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News