Started By
Message

re: Question on using slugs

Posted on 1/13/13 at 3:31 pm to
Posted by wiltznucs
Apollo Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2005
8973 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 3:31 pm to
Non-saboted slugs are terribly inaccurate, they drop very quickly. One of those cases where your better off with a rifle....
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Non-saboted slugs are terribly inaccurate, they drop very quickly. One of those cases where your better off with a rifle....








Was duck hunting first. Should of had my .44 mag with me, but due to the high water I'm hunting in, it would of been underwater.

quote:

Non-saboted slugs are terribly inaccurate, they drop very quickly.


Of course a rifle is better and yes, I know they shoot like shite. Only killed a couple deer with them many years ago. They do make one hell of a hole. That is the reason I lost the hog today due to a lack of a blood trail using buckshot. shite load of water everywere.


Oh, if I were using my very old 870 wingmaster that only shoots 3", but has a 30" barral with full choke, that sucker would of not gone far. That sucker rolled many a deer with buckshot over the years.
This post was edited on 1/13/13 at 4:55 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram