Started By
Message

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?

Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:02 pm to
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60563 posts
Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:02 pm to
He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent. Please don't jinx him.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31980 posts
Posted on 1/12/13 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent.

GOD frickING DAMNIT, WAY TO GO YOU JINXING MOTHER frickER
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39703 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 6:30 am to
quote:

He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent. Please don't jinx him.


Justin Vincent wasn't in Hill's class. This guy has everything Vincent has plus speed and more power. If it was Hill who got that first carry against Oklahoma he would have scored. Vincent got run down easily. No comparison.

And, yes, Hill is our best back, but I'll go back to Dalton Hilliard. We've never had a back as good as Hilliard at picking up "running back yards", and we still don't. Hill's great speed, though, turns some of those 10 yard carries into TDs. I like Faulk, but I'm calling him third.

If you consider Kevin, Chris, and Marshall Faulk, and Dalton and Kenny Hilliard plus Jeremy Hill, I say if a recruit's name is Faulk or starts with Hill, sign him up!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram