Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
357 posts

Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Lots of threads on Hill I know but really looking for quick yes or no answers.

I know he is young but his skill set is almost pro level already with his size speed agility and the shear fact stubborn arse miles has played a first year player over other experienced good running backs says a lot. I mean I just see something different about this guy and and we have definitely some great backs since 98..




This post was edited on 1/12 at 9:24 pm



Back to top
Share:
jacks40
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2007
11484 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Cecil?





Back to top
The Boat
LSU Fan
Bitch I'm from Louisiana
Member since Oct 2008
59966 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Great. This thread pretty much just fricked him for next season.





Back to top
JJ27
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2004
46867 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent. Please don't jinx him.





Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
357 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


someone that actually played more than 1 year





Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
357 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


you guys are fukin nerds bro I dont believe speaking highly of someone jinks them





Back to top
StealthCalais11
LSU Fan
10236 Charing Cross Road, LA, CA
Member since Aug 2011
4400 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


I think you're forgetting a certain 1,200+ yard rusher for the Patriots...





Back to top
  Replies (0)
LSUTil_iDie
LA-Monroe Fan
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2012
3832 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Let's see him play a FULL season before we start comparing him.





Back to top
Stevo
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
5518 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


He's already better than Addai?





Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
357 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


I'm not forgetting Ridley but lets get real this dude is 6'2 235 and a GD monster with speed





Back to top
darryljames30
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
12446 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Addai and Ridley were damn good.





Back to top
BACONisMEATcandy
LSU Fan
Delta, Amex, & Über Threads
Member since Dec 2007
41247 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Same thing was posted about hillard last season





Back to top
Topwater Trout
LSU Fan
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
35404 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


No





Back to top
  Replies (0)
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
357 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


What im sayin is his potential is what a special "one of a kind" horse that u can get u too a Championship looks like he has it all I believe..





Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
357 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Dude Hilliard is good but not even close to the same skill set I'm talkin about. Come On man





Back to top
  Replies (0)
easy money
LSU Fan
Member since Feb 2005
4516 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Hold up.....we haven't seen a rb even hold down the whole season as a starter in a few years. Hill is good, but to be critical, he has not shown a great ability to run in between the tackles and sustain drives. He hits a 50 yd td every game it seems, but we need him to get stronger and trust his blocking so he can pick up those 4 and 5 yard runs that keep drives alive.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Clark W Griswold
LSU Fan
Walley World
Member since Sep 2012
2449 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Cecil is the best I've ever seen. Davis and Toefield were pretty good too. I'd even put Hester up there. Hill hasnt done enough to be considered that special yet.





Back to top
ApexTiger
LSU Fan
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
30455 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Yes, quick reaction is, Hill is special, like a RB we haven't had in a while and we have had several good ones





Back to top
  Replies (0)
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
357 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Ill put potentially in my thread i agree he isnt yet but just very excited about what Ive seen and a back like this used properly will keep our defense off the field and actually sustain a MF drive is what can get us back into the SEC championship game next damn year ya heard me.





Back to top
heehaw
LSU Fan
Foothills of the Ohio River
Member since May 2009
4574 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Vincent in 2003
Addai in 2005
Ridley in 2010
Charles Scott in 2008

All just as good as Hill at this point.






Back to top


Back to top