| Posted by | Message |
AustinKnight 
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
237 posts
| Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 8:58 pm)
Lots of threads on Hill I know but really looking for quick yes or no answers.
I know he is young but his skill set is almost pro level already with his size speed agility and the shear fact stubborn arse miles has played a first year player over other experienced good running backs says a lot. I mean I just see something different about this guy and and we have definitely some great backs since 98..
This post was edited on 1/12 at 9:24 pm
|
| Back to top | Share on  |
jacks40 
Lamar Fan
Member since Oct 2007
9884 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 8:59 pm to AustinKnight)
Cecil?
|
| Back to top | |
The Boat
LSU Fan
:red:
Member since Oct 2008
46981 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:00 pm to AustinKnight)
Great. This thread pretty much just fricked him for next season.
|
| Back to top | |
JJ27
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2004
40827 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:02 pm to AustinKnight)
He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent. Please don't jinx him.
|
| Back to top | |
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
237 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:02 pm to jacks40)
someone that actually played more than 1 year
|
| Back to top | |
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
237 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:03 pm to AustinKnight)
you guys are fukin nerds bro I dont believe speaking highly of someone jinks them
|
| Back to top | |
StealthCalais11
LSU Fan
10236 Charing Cross Road, LA, CA
Member since Aug 2011
2732 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:03 pm to AustinKnight)
I think you're forgetting a certain 1,200+ yard rusher for the Patriots...
|
| Back to top | |
LSUTil_iDie
LSU Fan
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2012
2879 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:04 pm to AustinKnight)
Let's see him play a FULL season before we start comparing him.
|
| Back to top | |
Stevo
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
5170 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:04 pm to AustinKnight)
He's already better than Addai?
|
| Back to top | |
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
237 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:06 pm to LSUTil_iDie)
I'm not forgetting Ridley but lets get real this dude is 6'2 235 and a GD monster with speed
|
| Back to top | |
darryljames30
LSU Fan
Marcus Thornton/Freddy Adu fan
Member since Feb 2006
10095 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:07 pm to AustinKnight)
Addai and Ridley were damn good.
|
| Back to top | |
BACONisMEATcandy
LSU Fan
My opinions are my own
Member since Dec 2007
37675 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:08 pm to The Boat)
Same thing was posted about hillard last season
|
| Back to top | |
Topwater Trout
LSU Fan
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
24793 posts
 Online
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:08 pm to Stevo)
No
|
| Back to top | |
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
237 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:08 pm to AustinKnight)
What im sayin is his potential is what a special "one of a kind" horse that u can get u too a Championship looks like he has it all I believe..
|
| Back to top | |
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
237 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:10 pm to AustinKnight)
Dude Hilliard is good but not even close to the same skill set I'm talkin about. Come On man
|
| Back to top | |
easy money
LSU Fan
Member since Feb 2005
2718 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:10 pm to AustinKnight)
Hold up.....we haven't seen a rb even hold down the whole season as a starter in a few years. Hill is good, but to be critical, he has not shown a great ability to run in between the tackles and sustain drives. He hits a 50 yd td every game it seems, but we need him to get stronger and trust his blocking so he can pick up those 4 and 5 yard runs that keep drives alive.
|
| Back to top | |
Clark W Griswold
LSU Fan
Walley World
Member since Sep 2012
797 posts
Online
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:11 pm to AustinKnight)
Cecil is the best I've ever seen. Davis and Toefield were pretty good too. I'd even put Hester up there. Hill hasnt done enough to be considered that special yet.
|
| Back to top | |
ApexTiger
LSU Fan
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
28178 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:21 pm to Clark W Griswold)
Yes, quick reaction is, Hill is special, like a RB we haven't had in a while and we have had several good ones
|
| Back to top | |
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
237 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:21 pm to Clark W Griswold)
Ill put potentially in my thread i agree he isnt yet but just very excited about what Ive seen and a back like this used properly will keep our defense off the field and actually sustain a MF drive is what can get us back into the SEC championship game next damn year ya heard me.
|
| Back to top | |
heehaw
LSU Fan
Foothills of the Ohio River
Member since May 2009
3917 posts
| re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? (Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:30 pm to AustinKnight)
Vincent in 2003
Addai in 2005
Ridley in 2010
Charles Scott in 2008
All just as good as Hill at this point.
|
| Back to top | |
