Started By
Message

re: Sacramento Kings being sold to Seattle led Group

Posted on 1/9/13 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18847 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 3:35 pm to
It's great for Seattle fans. I don't blame them at all for wanting a new team, especially with how the Thunder became so successful shortly after leaving. I just don't get why the Kings couldn't be sold to a local group. They will have great fan support with a new ownership group instead of the worst owners in the NBA.
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12309 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

How long will it take for Seattle to not care about this team? 5-7 years?

Seattle successfully supported a team for 40 years. I think there's potential it will be the same, but at the same time, there's A LOT of burned bridges with fans here. If anything, people here will want to support our local businessmen who stepped up and made it all happen.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
19970 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

They better replace Key Arena after 2013-2014... that place was a big reason why they left in the first place. Awesome location in Seattle but the facility itself is a dump.


especially compared to the other pro facilities in that city
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 5:09 pm to
Good California already has way too many teams. Kings fans can just cheer for the Warriors. It's 1 hour 15 minute drive. That's about how long it takes me to get to the Hornets games from the Northshore. Basketball belongs in Seattle.
This post was edited on 1/9/13 at 5:21 pm
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 5:18 pm to
Stern has to have had the most teams switch cities under his watch out of all sports.
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12309 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

especially compared to the other pro facilities in that city

It's a pretty weird looking design. LINK
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5182 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Ironic that Seattle could be robbing another great fanbase of their team.


Just like when Baltimore stole the Browns.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70880 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Stern has to have had the most teams switch cities under his watch out of all sports.


Meh, bound to happen with the amount of time he served as commish.

Who was baseball's commissioner after Happy Chandler? They had a lot of moves in a relatively short time (Braves, A's, Browns, Dodgers, Giants, Senators).
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70880 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

relocating Seattle Stars (from Dallas).


Are the Stars really thinking about a move? I thought they had a solid fan base.

If that move happens, they might change the name to the Metropolitans. Lot of history there including the last non-NHL team to win the Stanley Cup.
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 8:07 pm to
I thought the Stars were in Minnesota. They were in Mighty Ducks anyway. I don't follow the NHL.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70880 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

I thought the Stars were in Minnesota.


Interesting history. Started out as the Minnesota North Stars in 1967. About 10 years later, the Cleveland Barons folded and were absorbed by Minnesota.

In the early 1990s they wanted to move to San Jose. The league decided to undo the Barons merger and give the North Stars owners the San Jose team (the Sharks). The Sharks took half the roster with them and both teams participated in an expansion draft.

In 1993 the new owners of the North Stars moved the team to Dallas and dropped the now-oxymoronic "North" from the name.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62729 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 8:28 pm to
Wasn't it just a few years ago that Sacramento ponied up some tax dollars to keep the Kings playing there?
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:24 pm to
Not so fast..
[link=(m.deadspin.com/5974637/that-whole-kings+to+seattle-deal-might-not-be-so-finalized-after-all)]LINK[/link]
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19307 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Are the Stars really thinking about a move?


The owner claims he isn't. But he's from Vancouver and has no ties to Dallas.

quote:

I thought they had a solid fan base


To the extent any southern hockey team has one, they do. But it still isn't enough. I've been to several games and the majority of fans in attendance are supporting the visiting team.
This post was edited on 1/9/13 at 10:26 pm
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7211 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 11:19 pm to
Just another example of a pro sports team forcing a city to subsidize their arena.

"Pay us or we'll leave."
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65763 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 12:02 am to
That's the proposed new Arena? Wtf?







Again, WTF?!
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 12:04 am to
That might be the wierdest looking basketball arena I've ever seen.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 12:06 am to
quote:

They better replace Key Arena after 2013-2014... that place was a big reason why they left in the first place. Awesome location in Seattle but the facility itself is a dump.


You can't sum it up that simply. There was way more to it.
Posted by LawDawg1
Member since Apr 2009
513 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 12:27 am to
Right. Sonics fans were lied to by Bennett who said e would keep team in Seattle. Everyone knew the truth that he wanted to move them to OK. Team sucked, owners lied, and attendance dropped. The Sonics left as Bennett had planned.

Seattle is looking to get a new team. No one is telling Sacramento that the ownership group will try to keep them on Sacramento. The plan up front is to move the team.

Big difference. Sucks for Sacramento fans. But they can find an ownership group of their winning they want to keep them. Nothing like what Bennett said and planned to do behind the scenes.
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12309 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 12:33 am to
quote:


Again, WTF?!

That was my first reaction too

Apparently they said not to focus on the rust color though. That big volcano looking thing will be able to change colors to whatever they want. That makes it a little bit better, but still weird.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram