Started By
Message

re: Chicago Tribune: Sources within Big 10 say they might want to expand to 18 teams

Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:44 am to
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35429 posts
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:44 am to
quote:

They're probably trying to get all the ACC schools (minus Pitt) that are in the AAU. GT, UVA, UNC, and Duke are the four such schools.



For what purpose? I understand taking Maryland and Rutgers to be able to get into the eastern coast, but at a certain point, you're watering down your revenue. Not sure how scale is really helping them in this case.
This post was edited on 1/7/13 at 11:45 am
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
8856 posts
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:47 am to
Always thought that four 16 team conferences wouldn't work because there are still teams out there that are good enough to warrant belonging in one of these super conferences. Now four 18 or 20 team conferences could work.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19311 posts
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:52 am to
quote:

For what purpose?


More revenue for Big Ten Network at least in theory. If you can command more $/subscriber by having a member school in a territory, you try to add a member there that brings something more than mere physical presence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram