Started By
Message
locked post

Tech IPO winners vs losers: A Historical Look

Posted on 1/3/13 at 4:32 pm
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
40087 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 4:32 pm
Ran into this page while researching some tech coding stuff. Pretty fascinating.

It's amazing to mouse over and see how many (or few, really) are +% after three years as opposed to -%.

LINK
Posted by Hand
far side of the moon
Member since Dec 2007
2064 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 5:37 pm to
Think about the IPO process and how relevant it is to tech as an industry. Tech isn't capital intensive in the traditional sense. They aren't going to need that funding to build more of XYZ. It's human capital intensive,... and that's what tech IPO's finance. It's a way for that human capital, and the PE that's been funding them, to cash out. When they go public, for the most part, the companies are peaking. Obviously, there are exceptions. Look at those that have prospered and the marketshare that they've captured. Those companies usually have really, really good products that achieve widespread adoption.

PE has matured as well. It's been interesting to me how many of the tech firms that have survived and prospered have internal PE teams that fund external.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram