- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can anyone defend ZIRP going into 2013?
Posted on 12/21/12 at 11:13 am to Doc Fenton
Posted on 12/21/12 at 11:13 am to Doc Fenton
quote:The is no "regulatory required amount of borrowed capital" that I know of.
for the regulatory required amount of borrowed capital
In fact, there is a limit to how much debt can be counted towards Tier II capital.
Most banks have zero capital notes which they use to count towards meeting their capital requirements.
The large, money center banks have LTD as part of supplemental capital but they are certainly not required to do so.
What am I misunderstanding here?
(Edited to insert a missing word.)
This post was edited on 12/21/12 at 11:16 am
Posted on 12/21/12 at 11:31 am to LSURussian
Whether its borrowed or not (and in an economic sense, customer deposits count as borrowed capital), the larger principle in that there is little opportunity cost to parking capital. This is true throughout the private sector, affecting not only banks, but also the new project decisions of industrial corporations.
This is the big problem with ZIRP. Lower interest rates will tend to lower the cost of taking on more business projects, other things being equal, but when (A) you start getting close to zero, and (B) there are strong signals indicating that interest rates will remain near zero for an extended period of time, then you paradoxically get an effect whereby a low interest rate environment will actually depress economic activity. A huge portion of capital in the economy gets diverted to public activities with very low returns, and which moreover act as a net drag on the labor force. That's what we're experiencing now.
We're not anything as extreme as Japan yet, but we seem to be moving closer to that kind of a situation. Indeed, there has been a disturbingly fashionable trend over the past year for pundits to defend how well Japan has managed its last two decades.
I say that a little short term recessionary deflation over the next few months could be just the longer term inflationary stimulus that we need. At some point, a deliberate transition must be made to an environment of rising interest rates. This hasn't occurred since the days of William McChesney Martin.
This is the big problem with ZIRP. Lower interest rates will tend to lower the cost of taking on more business projects, other things being equal, but when (A) you start getting close to zero, and (B) there are strong signals indicating that interest rates will remain near zero for an extended period of time, then you paradoxically get an effect whereby a low interest rate environment will actually depress economic activity. A huge portion of capital in the economy gets diverted to public activities with very low returns, and which moreover act as a net drag on the labor force. That's what we're experiencing now.
We're not anything as extreme as Japan yet, but we seem to be moving closer to that kind of a situation. Indeed, there has been a disturbingly fashionable trend over the past year for pundits to defend how well Japan has managed its last two decades.
I say that a little short term recessionary deflation over the next few months could be just the longer term inflationary stimulus that we need. At some point, a deliberate transition must be made to an environment of rising interest rates. This hasn't occurred since the days of William McChesney Martin.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News