- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU BBALL #19 in ESPN BBALL Index
Posted on 12/14/12 at 12:46 am to Elleshoe
Posted on 12/14/12 at 12:46 am to Elleshoe
quote:
to be honest, comparing season to season is retarded anyway no matter which side of the coin you're arguing. Sports just don't work like that.
Normally no. But in this case, we are literally swapping one player for another player, with essentially the same stats. As I said earlier I can concede Mitchell's edge in experience was more valuable than Randolph's edge in talent, enough for a couple games of improvement. But not +14 games. Not enough for a team to go from not making the NIT to would have been sweet 16 had they not gotten such a shitty seed.
quote:
oh! getting personal! you must be a real tough guy.
You did it as well. My method was more direct, the intended meaning was the same.
quote:
ok ok... he recruited a couple decent guys. He just couldn't do anything with them. This team would have 2 losses already with TJ still here and you know that shite is true.
Actually I don't. Despite popular, unfounded opinion, last yearJohnson's team OOC beat the teams they were supposed to beat, the way they were supposed to beat them, with the exception of South Alabama and won multiple games against respectable teams. So far this years team has beaten the teams they are supposed to beat, the way they were supposed to beat them, with the exception of NW St, and beaten 1 semi-respectable team.
The quality of the schedule up to this point is pretty terrible, there is no reason to think they couldn't be 6-0 with Johnson. I'll concede they would not have been as fun and exciting to watch, but that doesn't automatically mean they lose games.
3
Posted on 12/14/12 at 12:47 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
You did it as well.
Actually, I didn't. But you can't even see who is responding to who here. Unless you're an alter which I assume you are considering you have been posting here for one month and know I sat on the front row 6 years ago.
This post was edited on 12/14/12 at 12:48 am
Posted on 12/14/12 at 12:49 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
, but that doesn't automatically mean they lose games.
would have lost to NW St and Seton Hall IMO and I have no doubt about that.
don't forget last year we lost to Coastal Carolina and a pretty average Northwestern team. And were totally thrashed by Oregon.
This post was edited on 12/14/12 at 12:51 am
Posted on 12/14/12 at 12:51 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
ok ok... he recruited a couple decent guys. He just couldn't do anything with them. This team would have 2 losses already with TJ still here and you know that shite is true.
DAWG, WE LOST TO SOUTH ALABAMA LAST YEAR WITH TJ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Worst coached basketball game I've ever been to. even worse than the Hornets/Wiz game Tuesday night, which was pretty bad if you watched
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News