- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Serious question re:Roger
Posted on 12/11/12 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 12/11/12 at 5:36 pm
The guy screwed up in a major way. Doesn't he suffer punishment in SOME way for his false accusations that screwed up an entire season for what was the NFL's all-time best Offense??? 
Don't tell me he's the top guy. Everyone answers to someone. He answers to the Owners. Are they going to turn their collective heads on this?
Don't tell me he's the top guy. Everyone answers to someone. He answers to the Owners. Are they going to turn their collective heads on this?
3
Posted on 12/11/12 at 5:38 pm to Bayou
yes...he was the acting commissioner who presided over them making an astronomical amount of money...he'll be ok
Posted on 12/11/12 at 5:40 pm to Bayou
Posted on 12/11/12 at 5:50 pm to Breesus
Posted on 12/11/12 at 6:17 pm to Bayou
Was gonna start my own thread but figured I'd try within a thread first.
Can someone please explain the tortious interference and how it relates to Goodell in this case?
I know that it means intentional attempt to disrupt contractual relations, but I'm lost as to how it relates to Goodell and the Saints.
Can someone please explain the tortious interference and how it relates to Goodell in this case?
I know that it means intentional attempt to disrupt contractual relations, but I'm lost as to how it relates to Goodell and the Saints.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 6:42 pm to Sir Saint
quote:
Was gonna start my own thread but figured I'd try within a thread first.
Start another without clown interference.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 6:56 pm to Bayou
Wut
Posted on 12/11/12 at 6:59 pm to Sir Saint
quote:
intentional attempt to disrupt contractual relations,
Herefused to ratify CSP's contract extension and the reasoning was the presence of contract terms that have precedent in other ratified contracts.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 7:09 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Herefused to ratify CSP's contract extension and the reasoning was the presence of contract terms that have precedent in other ratified contracts.
Can you explain it like I'm 5? I'm not fluent in lawyerspeak
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News