Started By
Message

re: why doesn't louisina have another big state school that rivals lsu?

Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:02 pm to
Posted by Dr.Tesla
Member since Dec 2012
187 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:02 pm to
i don't think a 10-2 season is a failure. if that's the case lsu failed this year. LOL
Posted by Siderophore
Member since Nov 2010
3338 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

why doesn't louisina have another big state school that rivals lsu? 


Because Huey P Long.


Only real competition came from private, and that has been sliding ever since Tulane deemphasized athletics and left the SEC
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19552 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

i'm surprised smaller states like miss. has two big state rivals


You do realize that "big" is subjective?

Ole Miss and State have roughly the same amount of undergraduates (combined) as LSU.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167708 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

South Carolina is really similar to Louisiana in that way.

All Louisiana has is LSU with a bunch of smaller in-state schools and South Carolina has the Gamecocks and then a bunch of nobodies




Pretty much. Clemson is to South Carolina like ULL or ULM is to LSU.
Posted by Siderophore
Member since Nov 2010
3338 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:06 pm to
10-2 in the ACC is not 10-2 in the SEC

And that's even with the SEC being down this year....
Posted by Dr.Tesla
Member since Dec 2012
187 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:07 pm to
i could see louisiana state poiticians making it impossible for other colleges in state to recruit players lsu wants b/c they want louisiana college to be able to compete nationally. it's a big enough state where they should have a consistent rival.
Posted by CajunBandit
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
2888 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:07 pm to
In that soft conference most sec teams would win a few of those games twice.
Posted by Siderophore
Member since Nov 2010
3338 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:10 pm to
That's not what happened at all.

It wasn't that they kept other schools down.

It's that LSU was funneled all of the resources.

So there is only one national level flagship uni.

Everyone else waters themselves down because there are so many 4 year colleges here.
Posted by Dr.Tesla
Member since Dec 2012
187 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:11 pm to
i think sec is overrated. lsu would have lost two in the acc this year b/c their offense blows. you don't win games in the acc just with defense. you can win games scoring 14 points a game. that's the sec.
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
18176 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

lsu would have lost two in the acc this year b/c their offense blows



To who? And If you say Clemson I know you're trolling.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131554 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:13 pm to
Tulane was a charter SEC member. We made them quit.

What's your point?
Posted by BroadMagnolia
Stanford, CA
Member since Nov 2011
462 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:15 pm to
Not enough population
Posted by Siderophore
Member since Nov 2010
3338 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:15 pm to
No.

Just no.

The only team that would have given this one problems would be FSU.

And that is only if we had to play them early in the year, before the offense started to click. We were decimated by injuries and had to figure things out on the move.
Posted by ole yeller
Bates Motel
Member since May 2009
1938 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

i could see louisiana state poiticians making it impossible for other colleges in state to recruit players lsu wants b/c they want louisiana college to be able to compete nationally. it's a big enough state where they should have a consistent rival.


Politicians don't tell recruits where to go to school. Recruits want to play for the "State School", and that is LSU.
You mention Miss schools as a comparison to LSU, how about you go back 50 yrs and see where all our games were played with them...
Posted by Siderophore
Member since Nov 2010
3338 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:17 pm to
We have a lot more than Mississippi and only 300,000 less than Alabama.

It's not population. It's how the school systems were formed.
Posted by Dr.Tesla
Member since Dec 2012
187 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:17 pm to
i think you guys could lose to fsu, unc, gtech, nc state, miami, maybe even duke, b/c they are capble of scoring points and ur offense is stag.

u will lose to clemson. don't be bitching at me when you lose. u said the acc and clemson sucked, so when u lose, you suck.
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7636 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:19 pm to
Tulane, as noted was at one time the big in-state rival. But unlike a number of states which have two major public universities, one being a land grant university and one not, Louisiana merged the non-land grant school (LSU) with the A&M land grant school in 1870. After that, Louisiana never had two major public universities which would become competitors in sports.
Posted by DJTigers
MYRTLE BEACH
Member since Oct 2011
341 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:20 pm to
Actually there was a time when tulane was better than lsu for a while and were ranked. But lsu has always pretty much been the big brother, such as u.s.c. to clemson.
Posted by LawLessTyGer
Bay of Ponchartrain
Member since Jan 2009
1256 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:21 pm to
Who let you back on the soap box you buffoon?
Posted by CajunBandit
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
2888 posts
Posted on 12/8/12 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

 think you guys could lose to fsu, unc, gtech, nc state, miami, maybe even duke, b/c they are capble of scoring points
I see you're back on your game.

2/10
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram