- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who was our SEC-East opponent going to be if TAMU hadn't
Posted on 12/5/12 at 7:14 am to Rex
Posted on 12/5/12 at 7:14 am to Rex
quote:
So, why did we have to keep South Carolina instead of Kentucky?
Why would anyone complain about USC being on our schedule when we beat them, it was a signature win, and a catalyst to the improvement of the offense (and certainly Jeremy Hill) for the second half of the season. You guys are nothing but a bunch of whiners.
1
Posted on 12/5/12 at 10:06 am to The First Cut
quote:
You guys are nothing but a bunch of whiners
i think the "temporary" scheduling should be investigated. it is a fact that lsu's schedule got tougher and bama's got easier. i have not seen a challenge that the schedule was done by a confirmed bama graduate and fan (i think the ad's voted on it tho). the whole deal stinks and one certainly can argue that bama and georgia went to atlanta due to their schedule. whom beat whom ain't the only thing about a tougher schedule; the emotional price and the injury factors can be huge. look what injuries lsu had against florida; playing kentucky or mizzou probably wouldn't have taken near the toll. yes, bama and georgia did their share to get there but to argue, esp in the SEC, that the schedule is not a factor is bull shite. and that ain't whining.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News