LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more. - Page 2 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
MottLaneKid
LSU Fan
Gonzales
Member since Apr 2012
1349 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


quote:

And yes, I realize the teams may be approaching this game differently than the fans. Still think Clemson will be more "excited" to be playing us than vice versa


Absolutely ! If the LSU players have the same mindset as a lot of our fans, then the motivation factor might now be there. After LSU lost a heartbreaker to Alabama, the Tigers have struggled to put teams away.

You play to win the game ! Hopefully, our Tigers, will finish exams and get excited about playing a quality opponent. A top 10 finish would be nice.






Back to top
nerd guy
LSU Fan
Dallas
Member since Dec 2008
3790 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


The way our defense has been playing and as good as their offense is it could be a close game.





Back to top
JawjaTigah
LSU Fan
South of Tampa
Member since Sep 2003
10955 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


quote:

Based on a great win at Texas A&M and a win over a good South Carolina team.

And how long ago were those games played? And they were pretty close score-wise, even so.






Back to top
JawjaTigah
LSU Fan
South of Tampa
Member since Sep 2003
10955 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


quote:

After LSU lost a heartbreaker to Alabama, the Tigers have struggled to put teams away.
Kind of struggled some before, too.






Back to top
Last call
LSU Fan
On the lake
Member since Oct 2012
629 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


Wow,usually dont see a 3 pt difference. Most sites have 4.





Back to top
WylieTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Nov 2006
4770 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


Well our secondary does face Tahj Boyd and Sammy Watkins. I think that is a better duo than Wilson/Hamilton and Wallace/Moncrief.


This post was edited on 12/3 at 8:52 pm


Back to top
harry coleman beast
LSU Fan
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
40397 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


quote:

BabyTac


quote:

Louisiana Tech Fan


quote:

LSU has a hard time covering 4 against Arky, Auburn, Ole Piss, and Townsen. LSU should win the game but they have a habit of making it interesting.










Back to top
shaqfu33
Member since May 2007
102 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


It did open at 7 last night. Clemson was obviously bet heavily to move the line down so much. Motivation is the key to covering bowl games. Someone, or make that, alot of people don't think LSU will be as motivated to play in the Chicken Sandwich bowl as Clemson.







Back to top
Child of the Missip
LA-Lafayette Fan
Member since May 2012
1513 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


What's the freaking aloted points for this game? No way LSU doesn't put up atleast thirty on that defense.





Back to top
TigerSaints318
LSU Fan
Shreveport
Member since Dec 2009
940 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


Opened at -3.5 and total is 58.5





Back to top
shaqfu33
Member since May 2007
102 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


They adjust those "opening lines" all the time. It may have opened at that line today, but I can promise you that last night it was -7 on 5dimes.





Back to top
labamafan
Alabama Fan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
12368 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


I don't bet but take that and run. This game will be ugly before half time.





Back to top
Zipfer2022
New Orleans Saints Fan
Lakeview
Member since Nov 2011
2257 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


quote:

total is 58.5


Kind of like the under.






Back to top
JawjaTigah
LSU Fan
South of Tampa
Member since Sep 2003
10955 posts

re: LSU -4 vs Clemson. Thought it would be more.


It would be nice to see a really convincing LSU win for a change. When's the last time we've seen that happen this year? Did it?





Back to top


Back to top




//