Started By
Message

re: Enough with these Negative Drew Brees threads

Posted on 11/30/12 at 7:12 pm to
Posted by heatom2
At the plant, baw.
Member since Nov 2010
12810 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 7:12 pm to
Does Drew call the plays?
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36105 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 7:43 pm to
quote:


Look, Drew held the Saints and the fans hostage after being offered $18 million + a year. This at a time when his leadership was needed more than any other time. He skipped the spring trainings. He got what he wanted, the highest paid player in the NFL, so let me tell you, he earned the right to be criticised, and if you look at the first 3 games, his performance wasn't so hot there either. There is something called karma, and Brees brought this on himself with his holdout.


I agree with that

Brees is a fantastic player and deserved to be paid as such - he held out to be paid at a higher level than he deserves tho.

If he was really a team first guy he would have taken just a couple million less to make it less about his ego and more about making this season more successful. He didn't and the season isn't - the criticism he is catching now is deserved in those respects.
Posted by gmrkr5
NC
Member since Jul 2009
14886 posts
Posted on 12/2/12 at 8:31 pm to
wow
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 9:17 am
Posted by Braedan
Ragley, LA
Member since Jul 2012
659 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:40 pm to
I agree with you. I think everybody will have a bad game every once in a while. It's alright, he'll pick it up next week. Future HOF is getting thrashed on these boards, very ridiculous.
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
15911 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:54 pm to
this thread....wow.
Posted by jaTigerfan
Nashville
Member since Oct 2011
2090 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Aaron Brooks led

Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

If he was really a team first guy he would have taken just a couple million less to make it less about his ego and more about making this season more successful. He didn't and the season isn't - the criticism he is catching now is deserved in those respects.


Are you saying if he had taken less but nothing else about this season or the players we lost changed he wouldnt deserve this critisism?
or
Are you saying if he had taken less, thus proving he doesnt have an ego or w/e, this season would have been different?

Or is this statement the best possible time to use this:

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram