Started By
Message

re: Baseball Hall of Fame ballot out today....felt dirty looking at it..who gets in?

Posted on 11/28/12 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by LSUGrad9295
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
33546 posts
Posted on 11/28/12 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Had his 2 highest HR seasons at age 39 and 40. 3 straight 20 HR seasons at 38, 39, and 40.


His move to the outfield might have made him feel like he needed to be more of a run producer? His average went down those years when he was hitting more homers...maybe he was swinging for the fences too much?

quote:

Coincidentally, it also aligns with his move to the OF at age 37, where he would have needed extra speed, stamina, and a better throwing arm.


The extra speed sure didn't kick in...his stolen bases dwindled to almost nothing by this point.


Maybe he juiced...maybe he didn't...but your argument is not a strong one.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
8854 posts
Posted on 11/28/12 at 12:12 pm to
FWIW if I had to lean one way or the other on Biggio, I would say he was a juicer.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72056 posts
Posted on 11/28/12 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

His move to the outfield might have made him feel like he needed to be more of a run producer? His average went down those years when he was hitting more homers...maybe he was swinging for the fences too much?


He wasn't producing more runs, only home runs. His run and RBI totals were down from a typical Biggio season.

quote:

The extra speed sure didn't kick in...his stolen bases dwindled to almost nothing by this point.


His SBs dwindled in 2000. 3 years before he moved to the OF and 4 years before his big HR jump.

You dont have to believe it. It's not like I have proof. Just speculating.


quote:


This is exactly why I believe the steroids issue shouldn't be considered with voting, because if they do it turns into a Salem Witch Trial situation with speculation running rampant whether or not someone juiced.

I understand players that didn't take them are put at an unfair disadvantage, but you really have to choose which evil is lesser, voting players that possibly took PEDs or letting public perception that somebody took PEDs determine voting.


I agree. I'd vote Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, McGwire, and Palmiero in.
This post was edited on 11/28/12 at 12:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram