Started By
Message

re: Is two QB system blasphemy around here?

Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:23 am to
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:23 am to
quote:

It would have given defenses something else to prepare for since we were extremely one dimensional without a passing game


The problem is the passing game didn't "suck" against the first couple teams (UNT and UW) we beat the crap out of both of them and even Idaho. Yes Mett had a pick that gave Idaho 6 points, but we also scored 63 points in that game. The offense wasn't stagnant in a game until the Auburn game. That was the fourth game of the season, you can't just throw your third string QB in there on the road against an SEC team to start running the football. He wasn't taking the snaps in practice, and he shouldn't have been taking the snaps in practice. There were really only 2 games where our passing game sucked and we were so one dimentional that our offense was completely stagnant. Those 2 games were Auburn and Florida.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:37 am to
quote:

There were really only 2 games where our passing game sucked and we were so one dimentional that our offense was completely stagnant. Those 2 games were Auburn and Florida.

And Towson. So it was really a stretch of 3 straight games so had it continued it would have made sense to give it a shot

But this is all a moot point because they did figure it out and our offense shouldn't be changed now
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram