- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is two QB system blasphemy around here?
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:41 am
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:41 am
I personally would like to revisit a 2007 offense where one of our mobile QB comes in for a few plays in drives. The key is that it cannot be predictable. WareCat didn't quite do it for me...especially since it sucked.
Mett is a great QB, but he is a statue. I just think some of these dual threat QBs that we recruited could have a lot to offer to change the pace. Maybe it would have jump started the offense earlier in the season.
I know, original topic.
Mett is a great QB, but he is a statue. I just think some of these dual threat QBs that we recruited could have a lot to offer to change the pace. Maybe it would have jump started the offense earlier in the season.
I know, original topic.
10
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:42 am to zack7552
Would playing a less talented mobile quarterback make Mett any less of a statue?
In 2007, we used 2 QBs because both QBs had too much talent to sit on the bench.
In the years following we used 2 QBs because neither QB was talented enough to stay on the field full time.
Mett is talented enough to stay out there.
In 2007, we used 2 QBs because both QBs had too much talent to sit on the bench.
In the years following we used 2 QBs because neither QB was talented enough to stay on the field full time.
Mett is talented enough to stay out there.
This post was edited on 11/27/12 at 8:48 am
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:42 am to zack7552
quote:
Maybe it would have jump started the offense earlier in the season.
Yeah, having a running QB come in occasionally would have helped the WRs hold on the football and Mett make more accurate throws for the first few games.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:43 am to zack7552
quote:
I just think some of these dual threat QBs that we recruited could have a lot to offer to change the pace.
As I understand it, Bolden was injured in practice and lost for the season. That's 3rd hand but still.
As for the rest of your post, please find some lighter fluid & a match. Douse yourself in said fluid, then utilieze said match.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:50 am to zack7552
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:54 am to zack7552
How is Alabama's 2 qb system working? Georgia's? Notre Dame's?
Posted on 11/27/12 at 8:54 am to zack7552
Just what we need. Another fricking QB controversy.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:06 am to zack7552
quote:
Is two QB system blasphemy around here?
Yes.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:13 am to zack7552
Les Miles has totally brainwashed some of you into thinking the a quarterbacks "feet" are a necessary asset. Just because Jordan Jefferson couldn't pass the ball, and the best chance at a first down with him was to let the receivers run routes, and then have the qb tuck and run, doesn't mean that it should always be the case. The only teams that need a running quarterback are the spread option, or triple option teams. Les Miles does not run that type of offense. If he did, Russell Shepard should have been our qb from day 1.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 10:15 am to zack7552
No. Nothing wrong with the 2 QB system, when you have a proper scheme and a clear cut starter. The problem during Lee/Jefferson is that we couldn't figure out which QB was better.
I really have no problems with running a 2 QB system as long as it doesn't cause confusion with who the starting QB is. In fact, I really wouldn't mind seeing a 2 QB system in this offense, it might add more balance and give the defense more to prepare for.
I really have no problems with running a 2 QB system as long as it doesn't cause confusion with who the starting QB is. In fact, I really wouldn't mind seeing a 2 QB system in this offense, it might add more balance and give the defense more to prepare for.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 10:20 am to zack7552
quote:
he is a statue......with stone feet
those two quotes are amazingly accurate.
Having a QB that can stay in the pocket, or tuck and run, or tuck and run and also pass when someone gets open,would be a real detriment, huh? Like the detriment that Johnny Football is, huh?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News