- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anyone here play PC primarily?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:10 pm to ILikeLSUToo
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:10 pm to ILikeLSUToo
quote:
Sometimes, the card showed a 1fps gain in a 2.0 slot. They even tested some in PCIe 1.1, as well as at 4x, 8x, and 16x, and there was negligible difference. .1 to 1fps or so... Standard deviation would have to be higher than that, so it just shows that PCIe 3.0 means jack shite. It's like connecting a mechanical hard drive to a SATA 3 port.
That type of bandwidth really applies to work over time. Like workstations/folders/bionics.
Things like that. Systems that run 24/7 doing calculations is were you will see the increase in performance.
As for a bottleneck or bandwidth being restricted, I think the PCIe 3.0 is and will be best used by 512bit GPUs.
None the less, like you said.. there is really no difference in performance between the 2.
2
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:13 pm to LSU Coyote
Ooh, good point. I want to see a test in average hashrates across platforms over, say, a week of 24/7 mining.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News