- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

So, let's get this straight regarding a legal catch in the NFL
Posted on 11/5/12 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 11/5/12 at 10:55 pm
Calvin Johnson can catch it in the air, roll around with it for a second or two, and then lose it up on the way to a celebration and it's an incompletion, but somebody can use the turf to help secure the ball, no hands beneath it, because it hit his hands first, and that's a catch.
Something ain't right there.
And, oh, btw, if you duck your helmet into somebody trying to tackle you at your waist, that shouldn't be a penalty on the tackler.
Something ain't right there.
And, oh, btw, if you duck your helmet into somebody trying to tackle you at your waist, that shouldn't be a penalty on the tackler.
This post was edited on 11/6/12 at 8:59 am
Posted on 11/5/12 at 10:56 pm to Rex
It's the NFL and the Saints. Rules get made up as they go. Kind of like the Obama administration and the constitution.
This post was edited on 11/5/12 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 11/5/12 at 10:57 pm to Rex
You and Maggie should make a video about it
Posted on 11/5/12 at 10:58 pm to Rex
Nothing illegal about that hit.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 10:59 pm to Patrick O Rly
Alas.....everything you said is correct my friend.
Sometimes football needs to be simple. A hit is a hit and if the ball touches the ground....it's not a dang catch.
Sometimes football needs to be simple. A hit is a hit and if the ball touches the ground....it's not a dang catch.
This post was edited on 11/5/12 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 11/5/12 at 10:59 pm to Rex
That was an easy call...catch all the way.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:01 pm to Rex
that catch was legit. He had the ball in both hands before it hit the ground and the ball never shifted from hitting the ground once he had possession. Receiver had complete control of it. Refs got it right
This post was edited on 11/5/12 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:01 pm to Rex
Rex get that anus prepped for tomorrow
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:04 pm to Rex
The catch in the first quarter by the eagles was not a catch.
Celek's was not a catch.
Megatron's was a catch.
The penalty on Vick was not a penalty, he ducked into it.
Celek's was not a catch.
Megatron's was a catch.
The penalty on Vick was not a penalty, he ducked into it.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:06 pm to Kafka
quote:
get that anus prepped for tomorrow
He keeps it greasy this time of year.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:07 pm to WreckinRams05
quote:
WreckinRams05 So, let's get this straight regarding a legal catch in the NFL that catch was legit. He had the ball in both hands before it hit the ground and the ball never shifted from hitting the ground once he had possession. Receiver had complete control of it. Refs got it right
bullshite. You could clearly see the ball shift once it hit the ground. NOT a catch.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:07 pm to WreckinRams05
quote:
WreckinRams05 So, let's get this straight regarding a legal catch in the NFL that catch was legit. He had the ball in both hands before it hit the ground and the ball never shifted from hitting the ground once he had possession. Receiver had complete control of it. Refs got it right
bullshite. You could clearly see the ball shift once it hit the ground. NOT a catch.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:10 pm to WreckinRams05
quote:
and the ball never shifted from hitting the ground once he had possession
Crank the DVR back up. On one of the angles you can clearly see the ball touch the ground and one hand barely come off ball for a split second as the ball shifted. It was plain as day if you're watching close enough.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:10 pm to Rex
50/50
I think it was a catch. I'm about 75% in agreement with the call
The penalty for the illegal hit on Vick though? Complete bullshite. Absolutely horrific call, if it were the replacement officials, ESPN would be showing it over and over again.
Remember Rex, Dems vote on Wednesday.
I think it was a catch. I'm about 75% in agreement with the call
The penalty for the illegal hit on Vick though? Complete bullshite. Absolutely horrific call, if it were the replacement officials, ESPN would be showing it over and over again.
Remember Rex, Dems vote on Wednesday.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:11 pm to Lafayette VooDoo
quote:
bullshite. You could clearly see the ball shift once it hit the ground. NOT a catch.
who cares saints walked away with the W
This post was edited on 11/5/12 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:20 pm to WreckinRams05
I did not see the ball move once it hit the ground. Looked like he had possession with both hands, one hand came off a bit, but the ball didn't move while being held by the other hand. I thought it was a catch on every angle I saw.
Posted on 11/5/12 at 11:27 pm to Rex
quote:
Calvin Johnson can catch it in the air, roll around with it for a second or two, and then lose it up on the way to a celebration and it's an incompletion, but somebody can use the turf to help secure the ball, no hands beneath it, because it hit his hands first, and that's a catch.
Something ain't right there.
And, oh, btw, if you duck your helmet into somebody trying to tackle you at your waste, that shouldn't be a penalty on the tackler.
I thought for sure, after the second bad call, i wasn't gonna be able to stomach this game. P Rob nullified those calls though. Then he stuck his head up his arse on the Desean td!!!
Popular
Back to top

16










