- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Has there ever been a season with so many underperforming RBs?
Posted on 11/1/12 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 11/1/12 at 8:28 pm
Besides Adrian Peterson, Ray Rice, and Foster, every other running back seems really unreliable this year. I don't remember it being this bad.
Anyone else think this?
To name a few.
Murray
MJD
Sjax
Fjax
McFadden
McCoy
Charles
Mathews
Sproles
Anyone else think this?
To name a few.
Murray
MJD
Sjax
Fjax
McFadden
McCoy
Charles
Mathews
Sproles
Posted on 11/1/12 at 8:34 pm to imAMAZING
quote:
McCoy
Why do people keep listing the #5 RB as some sort of disappointment
Posted on 11/1/12 at 8:36 pm to PhiTiger1764
McCoy isn't dominating like he is capable of. His touchdowns are saving his value though, but the yardage is pretty bad for a top 4 pick.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 8:38 pm to imAMAZING
I picked McCoy at #4 and am happy with his production (PPR). Lynch has been pretty consistent too.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 8:40 pm to imAMAZING
He hasn't been Rice/Foster good.. but he has been very consistent from a fantasy standpoint. I am not upset picking him #4 overall.
ETA: PPR league. IDK what he is doing in non-PPR
ETA: PPR league. IDK what he is doing in non-PPR
This post was edited on 11/1/12 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 11/1/12 at 9:17 pm to PhiTiger1764
Man I thought McCoy would score 17 times this season
Posted on 11/1/12 at 9:26 pm to imAMAZING
How many TDs does McCoy have?
Posted on 11/1/12 at 9:41 pm to imAMAZING
Jamaal Charles is not underperforming.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 9:48 pm to imAMAZING
Yet another reason to pay for a top QB. They are simply more reliable.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 9:54 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Yet another reason to pay for a top QB. They are simply more reliable.
bahahahahaha.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 10:56 pm to imAMAZING
quote:
MJD
Was not a first round pick, second at earliest... and he's injured... Yet he's underperforming?
Posted on 11/1/12 at 11:35 pm to bicroundstic2008662
quote:
bahahahahaha.
When my top player shits the bed, he will still score 20 points. When your top player could get like 5.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:08 am to Vicks Kennel Club
Who do you speak of? Mr. Rodgers? I do not think people actually get it. There are 9 Quarterbacks that put up 18 to 22.9 a game. That is not much of a spread between 9 quarterbacks in terms of value. If you are talking about consistency, then Rodgers is not who you want. He has 3 out of 8 games below 13 points. That also means almost the entire league will have equal status at quarterback. The factor that separates the winners from losers is the running backs. Yea, they may not get as many points per game with a running back, but those who draft qbs in the first three rounds are just limiting their chances at getting a consistent.
This post was edited on 11/2/12 at 12:11 am
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:26 am to bicroundstic2008662
You just said Jamal Charles wasn't underperforming lol
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:40 am to GynoSandberg
He is coming off of an ACL injury. He is playing better than I expected. If you expected more from him, then you are obviously underperforming.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:49 am to bicroundstic2008662
He's scored under 10 points 5 of the 8 games. That's better than you expected? A 1st/2nd rd pick? Lol. Pretty sure everyone expected way better.
He tore his acl 10 weeks before Adrian Peterson. That's not an excuse. It obviously didn't bother him against the Saints
He tore his acl 10 weeks before Adrian Peterson. That's not an excuse. It obviously didn't bother him against the Saints
Posted on 11/2/12 at 4:17 am to PhiTiger1764
McCoy and DMC have been disappointing as hell in standard. DMC seems to be picking it up there because he's getting a thousand touches, but McCoy is only good in ppr when he's getting 5-7 catches for 25yds AND a TD.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 8:44 am to bicroundstic2008662
quote:
The factor that separates the winners from losers is the running backs.
False.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 9:16 am to bicroundstic2008662
Yeah, no.
In a PPR league with 6 point TD, the difference in QB's is bigger than RB's.
1. Drew Brees - 28.96 ppg
5. Tom Brady - 24.98 ppg
10. Andy Dalton - 19.92 ppg
1. Arian Foster - 20.86 ppg
5. Doug Martin - 16.67 ppg
10. Jamaal Charles - 15.09 ppg
The difference between the top QB/RB and the fifth best QB/RB is roughly five points apiece. However, the gap gets strung out because the drop from Brady to Dalton is 5 ppg, while Martin to Charles is only about 1.5 ppg. The myth of there is more of a difference between the top RB is simply false. The drop off is bigger among QB's. Unless you own Rice or Foster, you have a pretty small difference between your RB.
Put it this way, the gap from Brady to Dalton is roughly the same as the gap from Adrian Peterson (3rd ranked RB) to Michael Turner (21st ranked RB). Look at the facts before you post your false arguments.
In a PPR league with 6 point TD, the difference in QB's is bigger than RB's.
1. Drew Brees - 28.96 ppg
5. Tom Brady - 24.98 ppg
10. Andy Dalton - 19.92 ppg
1. Arian Foster - 20.86 ppg
5. Doug Martin - 16.67 ppg
10. Jamaal Charles - 15.09 ppg
The difference between the top QB/RB and the fifth best QB/RB is roughly five points apiece. However, the gap gets strung out because the drop from Brady to Dalton is 5 ppg, while Martin to Charles is only about 1.5 ppg. The myth of there is more of a difference between the top RB is simply false. The drop off is bigger among QB's. Unless you own Rice or Foster, you have a pretty small difference between your RB.
Put it this way, the gap from Brady to Dalton is roughly the same as the gap from Adrian Peterson (3rd ranked RB) to Michael Turner (21st ranked RB). Look at the facts before you post your false arguments.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 9:32 am to Vicks Kennel Club
Your post is pointless, what you completely fail to acknowledge is that Charles was probably drafted in the 2nd or 3rd round of most leagues while Dalton may have gone undrafted or definitely super late. Thus the person who went Foster+Dalton ALSO I repeat ALSO has a 2nd rd pick!
The person who went Brees+Charles has a 12th rd pick if you are trying to make a comparison to the above situation.
What would you rather have: Brees+Charles+12th rd pick or Foster+2nd rd pick+Dalton????
You have to look at WHERE these people are drafted, it isn't a simple points:points comparison, it is all about VALUE.
The person who went Brees+Charles has a 12th rd pick if you are trying to make a comparison to the above situation.
What would you rather have: Brees+Charles+12th rd pick or Foster+2nd rd pick+Dalton????
You have to look at WHERE these people are drafted, it isn't a simple points:points comparison, it is all about VALUE.
Popular
Back to top

5





