- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What was the deal with the Loston penalty?
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:14 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:14 am
From where I was, which was fairly close to the play it looked like a horrendous phantom call like the Packers/Seahawks game, but it's hard to tell in person. Flashbacks of Auburn 04 and 06.
Was there contact? What was the story?
Was there contact? What was the story?
This post was edited on 10/14/12 at 9:18 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:15 am to Ghostfacedistiller
Tripped on his feet ref didn't like it.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:15 am to Ghostfacedistiller
well he did touch him out of bounds
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:16 am to Ghostfacedistiller
How in the frick do you compare that to Green Bay/Seattle?
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:16 am to Ghostfacedistiller
quote:
Was their contact?
about a half inch piece of his jersey brushed the guy's shoulder pads on the way by...
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:16 am to Ghostfacedistiller
The announcers said he "intended" a helmet to helmet play. He lead with his head.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:16 am to Boudin
Not the last play of the GB/Seattle but on the final two series. Phantom PIs
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:16 am to Slickback
He intended ahahahahaha
Refs can now penalize suspected intent.
Refs can now penalize suspected intent.
This post was edited on 10/14/12 at 9:18 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:17 am to Ghostfacedistiller
ref's threw a flag on the "intent".
never saw that before.
that's like calling holding on a lineman with no arms claiming "if he had arms, he would have held the dt"
never saw that before.
that's like calling holding on a lineman with no arms claiming "if he had arms, he would have held the dt"
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:18 am to tigerdup07
quote:
that's like calling holding on a lineman with no arms claiming "if he had arms, he would have held the dt"
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:18 am to Ghostfacedistiller
He went in head first for a shoulder high knock out shot on a wide receiver.
The human missile missile missed but got the flag anyway.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:18 am to tigerdup07
quote:
ref's threw a flag on the "intent".
Seriously? It was "intent?"
No slippery slope there. I've never heard of that before at any level of football.
This post was edited on 10/14/12 at 9:20 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:19 am to Slickback
quote:
The announcers said he "intended" a helmet to helmet play. He lead with his head.
It seems silly but as someone else mentioned it is similar to when a player swings at another but misses. The ref is going to call it regardless of whether it hit because the intent was there. Unfortunately he brushed against the WR as well.
It is a technicality that could have been ignored given that the refs ignored many borderline calls that should have been called on SC.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:19 am to Ghostfacedistiller
If you remember Loston had another penalty of "intent" in a game last year
Refs seem to like to flag him for "targeting"
Refs seem to like to flag him for "targeting"
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:21 am to ItTakesAThief
looked like he pulled up to me...
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:22 am to tigerdup07
quote:
that's like calling holding on a lineman with no arms claiming "if he had arms, he would have held the dt"
Ok I just bust out laughing
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:22 am to TheDoc
quote:
If you remember Loston had another penalty of "intent" in a game last year
I don't remember that, not saying you're wrong, I just don't remember.
I get throwing a punch, but you could basically call "intent" on almost every play if you wanted.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:25 am to Ghostfacedistiller
I want to say it was against Arkansas last year
He was going after the WR and jumped over him an the ref flagged him for "intent" because his helmet was down
He was going after the WR and jumped over him an the ref flagged him for "intent" because his helmet was down
Posted on 10/14/12 at 9:26 am to Ghostfacedistiller
I honestly don't know what to think of that call. It sure looked like Loston was trying to kill the guy after he went out of bounds.... BUUUTTT for that to be the case Loston would have to have the worst aim in world history. I mean how to you miss a guy out of bounds that isn't trying to dodge you?
The contact would never have been called except for the fact that it looked like he tried to hit the guy!
The contact would never have been called except for the fact that it looked like he tried to hit the guy!
Popular
Back to top

8








